Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009389
Original file (20140009389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 January 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009389 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to honorable.

2.  The applicant states at the time of his discharge he was being treated for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder and his medical conditions were not properly considered.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 July 1998.  After completing training he was awarded military occupational specialty 91K (Medical Lab Specialist).
3.  His record contains limited information in regard to the discharge and his medical records are not available for review.

4.  General Court-Martial Order Number 6, dated 14 June 2001, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School and Fort Sam Houston, Fort Sam Houston, TX, shows the applicant was convicted of violating:

* Article 107, making false official statements
* Article 121, larceny
* Article 130, housebreaking
* Article 134, breaking restriction

5.  That part of his sentence pertaining to forfeiture of all pay and allowances and confinement for 9 months was approved and, except for the part of the sentence extending to a BCD, was ordered executed.

6.  General Court-Martial Order Number 256, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill, OK, dated 30 October 2002, announced the sentence had been affirmed.  Article 71(c) having been complied with, the BCD part of the sentence was to be executed.

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 7 February 2003.  He received a BCD.

8.  The applicant provides a statement in which he contends that he was black-balled and not properly represented during his court-martial proceedings.  Specifically, he was:

* denied food and threatened to be killed
* forced to put kiwi (boot polish) over his eye brows
* denied his sign-on bonus after graduation
* accused of being a drug dealer
* advised by his counsel not to say anything in his defense because it could result in 3 years in prison
* assaulted on camera by the superintendent of the confinement facility
* unable to support his son because he was not paid properly
* denied the right to walk with his advanced individual training class and forced to make up an examination that others did not
* harassed by the military police
* forced to quit other employment
* forced to live in the dorms with bats, rats, gnats, and roaches
* denied Army Relief funds and a pay advance
* bribed into coming on the installation resulting in his arrest
* threatened by correction officers with extra time on his sentence if he did not permit sexual searches
* released from confinement and told to go to a homeless shelter
* denied Department of Veterans Affairs medical treatment
* denied his GI Bill education benefits which he paid into

9.  His record does not show that he was under treatment or received a profile for any physical and mental health condition during his period of service.

10.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  	Chapter 3 provides that a Soldier will be given a punitive discharge (dishonorable discharge or BCD) pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

12.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His contentions are noted; however, he has not provided any documentary evidence or convincing argument showing he did not commit the crimes for which he was convicted.  Further, there is no evidence to corroborate that he suffered from any medical condition that led to his misconduct.  The available evidence shows that his court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the final discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

2.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge, if clemency is determined to be appropriate, to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Given the seriousness of the applicant's misconduct, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.  As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 





are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009389



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009389



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015342

    Original file (20130015342.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his period of honorable service and/or upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD). Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents), in effect during the applicant's period of service, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army and was the governing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022620

    Original file (20110022620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 27 July 1972, NJP was imposed against him for misappropriating an ambulance. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000046

    Original file (20150000046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge and that his separation date be corrected. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with the applicable law and regulation and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000961

    Original file (20150000961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he is grateful for the partial relief granted by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) by characterizing his initial period of active duty service as honorable. Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records. On 9 April 2014, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his characterization of service during the period of his initial enlistment in the RA from 6 March 1980...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028104

    Original file (20100028104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for this period of service shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) as a result of court-martial with a character of service as under conditions other than honorable. The preponderance of the evidence shows he completed only 7 months of service in Vietnam. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078721C070215

    Original file (2002078721C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Court-Martial Order Number 17, published by Headquarters, Fourth United States Army, dated 14 April 1958. Army Regulation 635-204 provided the policy for discharge of enlisted personnel pursuant only to approved sentences of a general court-martial empowered to impose a dishonorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024539

    Original file (20110024539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. His punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088922C070403

    Original file (2003088922C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 29 August 1969, the United States Army Court of Military Review upon consideration of the entire record, including consideration of the issues specified by the appellant, held that the findings of guilty and the sentence as approved by the convening authority were correct in law and fact.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001119

    Original file (20120001119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001119 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge 13. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offense for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of his discharge based on clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008358

    Original file (20110008358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge. The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial which was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged at the time.