Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009363
Original file (20140009363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  20 January 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009363


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show 11 October 1971.

2.  The applicant states proof of his correct entry date is required for a Department of Veterans Affairs loan.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract-Armed Forces of the United States) which was prepared during his enlistment processing.  Item 6 (Date of Enlistment/Induction) contains the entry "71 Oct 12" and he authenticated this document with his signature in Item 57 (Oath of Office) on 12 October 1971.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 October 1971, for a period of 6 years.  On 6 January 1972, he was ordered to active duty training (ADT).

4.  Upon completion of ADT, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty 94B.  On 6 May 1972, he was released from active duty (REFRAD) to the USAR.

5.  The DD Form 214 issued the applicant upon his REFRAD shows he completed 4 months and 1 day of creditable active duty service.  Item 17c contains the entry "6 JAN 72."  Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows he had 2 months and 24 days of other service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains item-by-item instructions for preparing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for completing the date entered active duty states to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of the DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends item 17c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 11 October 1971.  There is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  By regulation, the DD Form 214 is a summary of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty and item 17c will list the beginning date of this service.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was ordered to ADT on 6 January 1972 and this is the date listed in item 17c on his DD Form 214.  

3.  While the evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 12 October 1971 vice 11 October 1971, there are no regulatory provisions for listing USAR entry dates on the DD Form 214, except in item 22a(2).  Accordingly, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009363



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009363



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021977

    Original file (20090021977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1967, which is properly reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 November 1967. Since the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 1 January 1973, almost 1 year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending item 11d of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016583

    Original file (20080016583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows that he entered active duty on 20 January 1973, and that his military records show that he actually entered active duty on 20 January 1971. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 20 January 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008051

    Original file (20100008051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22a(1) properly shows the total amount of service completed between 28 June 1968 (inclusive date of current tour of duty) through 24 August 1973, a period of 5 years, 1 month, and 27 days. Item 22a(2) properly shows the total amount of service in the USAR DEP (2 June to 10 September 1967) and enlisted time from 11 September 1967 to 27 June 1968. The evidence of record he served in an enlisted status from 11 September 1967 through 27 June 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007230

    Original file (20130007230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 January 1970 to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of private (PV2)/E-2; b. item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve), his terminal date as 22 September 1975 instead of 21 May 1975; c. item 17c (Date of Entry), he entered active duty on 22 September 1969 instead 10 September 1969; and d. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010224

    Original file (20120010224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 October 1965 and he was released from active duty on 25 October 1967 and transferred to the USAR after serving 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013262

    Original file (20130013262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he entered the Army Reserve in the spring of 1970 not on 11 March 1971 * his first duty assignment was at Fort Sill, OK, where he graduated from the Artillery Officer Basic Course * he then spent one year in Vietnam with the 101st Airborne Division * his final duty assignment was at Fort Dix, NJ * he was discharged on 10 November 1971 * he just wants his records to reflect he served his country for a full year in South Vietnam 3. The regulation in effect at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028921

    Original file (20100028921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He was discharged on 5 October 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011702

    Original file (20100011702.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his records be corrected to reflect his date of birth (DOB) as 11 October 1948 and to reflect his period of service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) as 5 January 1970 through 8 January 1971. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.