Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009274
Original file (20140009274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  15 January 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009274 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 2 December 2010, to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 and his award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 is incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214
* the first page of a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award)
* orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) on 6 January 2010.  

2.  On 13 July 2010, he entered active duty for initial entry training.  He completed initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31B (Military Policeman).  

3.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of private/E-2 by Joint Force Headquarters (JFHQ) ALARNG Orders 194-506, which were issued on 13 July 2010 and were effective 12 July 2010.  
4.  On 2 December 2010, he was released from active duty and returned to his ALARNG unit of assignment.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows he completed 4 months and 20 days of net active service.  Also – 

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) shows "PV2" and item 4b (Pay Grade) shows "E02"
* item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service Ribbon

5.  His records show he was awarded the AAM by Headquarters, 203rd Military Police Battalion Permanent Order 127-006, dated 10 May 2011.

6.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 by JFHQ ALARNG Orders 007-515, which were issued on 7 January 2012 and were effective          5 January 2012.

7.  On 18 February 2014, he was honorably discharged from the ALARNG.  His National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows:

* the period of service as 6 January 2010 through 18 February 2014
* item 5a (Rank) shows "SPC" and item 5b (Pay Grade) shows "E4"
* item 15 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded) shows, among other awards, an AAM

8.  Army Regulation 635-8 (Separation Processing and Documents) provides guidance for the completion of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a summary of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of all current active, prior active and prior inactive duty service at the time of the Soldier's release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The DD Form 214 will be prepared for Reserve Component Soldiers who have completed active duty that results in the award of an MOS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Army Regulation 635-8 requires the DD Form 214 to document a summary of a Soldier's period of active service.  In this case, the applicant's DD Form 214 covered his period of active service for training in MOS 31B.

2.  During the period covered (13 July 2010 through 2 December 2010) his rank/grade was private/E-2, as verified by promotion orders.  He was not promoted to the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 until 7 January 2012, well after the completion of his term of active duty for training.  Additionally, the AAM he received was awarded on 10 May 2011, also after the period covered by his    DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant received an honorable discharge from the ALARNG on 18 February 2014.  On this document are reflected both his rank/grade of specialist/E-4 as well as the award of the AAM.

4.  Based upon the foregoing, there is no basis upon which to grant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________  X___________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009274





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009274



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022176

    Original file (20120022176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. According to the TXARNG, the applicant was on a promotion list for 13B from 2008-2011. f. The TXARNG states one Soldier was deployed and promoted to E5/SGT, MOS 13B2O who would have been below the applicant on the Enlisted Promotion (EPS) List. a. Paragraph 7-28a states States/territories will conduct annual promotion boards for each grade and publish a promotion list.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004914

    Original file (20130004914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. 2011 CPMOS Promotion Points List (Grade E-4 to E-5), dated 1 October 2011, that shows: (1) the applicant was recommended for promotion to grade E-5 in her PMOS 42A in CPMOS 42A with 556 points, her status was listed as MT, and she elected to be promoted in her unit. The minimum information on a promotion list will be the Soldier's name, promotion or CPMOS, promotion points, and a code to determine M-Day, technician, or AGR status. The evidence of record shows the applicant's 10 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011193

    Original file (20140011193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in the rank and pay grade of SPC/ E-4 and he was awarded the AAM; however, they were not recorded on his DD Form 214 when he separated from active duty. In review, the applicant’s records do not have evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his first term of enlisted service was honorable. Accordingly, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period of 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004225

    Original file (20090004225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 14 August 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his proper rank and pay grade and to add earned awards. Chapter 2 contains DD Form 214 preparation instructions and the instructions in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated that the PQR and all documents on file in the OMPF would be used as the source for DD Form 214 entries. Notwithstanding the pencil entry in item 18 of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020880

    Original file (20120020880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Written Agreement Officer Affiliation Bonus Addendum * SRIP Guidance 10-01 * two DA Forms 2823 * request for an exception to policy to receive the bonus and subsequent denial * email correspondence CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The DCSPER mentioned that when the applicant transitioned from the RA to the ALARNG a BCN was not requested. The applicant was commissioned into the ALARNG on 2 July 2011...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009586

    Original file (20140009586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 30 March 2012, to show he retired for disability in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 vice sergeant (SGT)/E-5. On 20 August 2002, MIARNG published Orders 232-011 honorably discharging him from the ARNG in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 effective 1 August 2002 in accordance with National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) paragraph 8-26g(3)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008772C070208

    Original file (20040008772C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his rank as private first class (PFC) and to show the award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty on 11 January 2001 and was promoted to PV2 on 11...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058728C070421

    Original file (2001058728C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the second award of the Good Conduct Medal, the third award of the Army Achievement Medal, and the first award of the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show his pay grade as “E-4” instead of “E-3” and to show two Good Conduct Medals, three Army Achievement Medals, and one Army Commendation Medal. Evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013485

    Original file (20080013485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Chief, Enlisted Board Support Branch, Promotions Division, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, MO, recommended the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the applicant’s rank/grade as SPC/E-4 with an effective date of 1 July 2008, and stated that records available at his office indicated that the applicant was released from the Active Army on 10 July 2008. When the commander denies promotion, he or she may promote the Soldier on the next automated Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008984

    Original file (20100008984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DD Form 214 * two DD Forms 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) * DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)) Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 2-7 of Army Regulation 635-5 states that a new DD Form 214 will be issued when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...