Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008903
Original file (20140008903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  25 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008903 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in
diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The SRP determined that the MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP also considered whether the applicant's MH conditions, regardless of specific diagnosis, were unfitting for continued military service.  The SRP's charge with respect the MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the physical evaluation board (PEB) was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB's fitness adjudication.  The SRP's threshold for countering PEB not-unfit determinations required a preponderance of evidence.  The applicant was returned to duty after the initial MH evaluation, she had an S2 level profile without MH limitations, and there were no other indications of unfitness due to an MH condition in the record such as prolonged absence from duty, emergency or urgent psychiatric care, or prolonged psychiatric hospitalizations. 

4.  After  due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the applicant's MH condition and no disability ratings was recommended.

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted. 







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      ___________x____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140008903



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010492

    Original file (20140010492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, and the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination. To consider if this diagnostic variance represented a possible disadvantage to the applicant during the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process, the SRP first considered if the preponderance of the evidence indicated unfitness to perform military duties. The record indicated treatment was improving his symptoms and his symptoms were not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010475

    Original file (20140010475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the mental health condition during processing through the military disability evaluation system. The SRP’s charge with respect to the MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the physical evaluation board (PEB) was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010681

    Original file (20140010681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination. The commander's statement supported a conclusion that there was no unfitting MH impairment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011585

    Original file (20140011585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE O BOARD DATE: 6 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011585 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudicated the referred MH conditions as not unfitting and noted that adjustment disorder was not a compensable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006058

    Original file (20150006058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010690

    Original file (20140010690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018425

    Original file (20140018425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010686

    Original file (20140010686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted the applicant contended post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in his application, but also noted he was not diagnosed with PTSD prior to the final PEB adjudication. The SRP's charge with respect MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007370

    Original file (20140007370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined the applicant’s MH condition to be not unfitting by the PEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013480

    Original file (20140013480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered whether a change of the diagnosis to PTSD was recommended. The SRP also agreed that there was not a preponderance of evidence in support of a recommendation to change the service diagnosis from anxiety disorder to PTSD.