Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008564
Original file (20140008564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008564 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he received the actual Purple Heart while he was in Vietnam, but the award was never placed on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 23 May 1968.  He served in Vietnam from 17 October 1968 to 16 October 1969.  He was honorably released from active duty on 22 May 1970.

3.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.  His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not contain an entry.  There is no documentation in the available record that shows he sustained wounds or was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action.

5.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who was wounded in action against an armed enemy of the United States or as a direct result of an act of such enemy provided the wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer.  For the purpose of considering an award of this decoration, a "wound" is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), currently in effect, states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no available medical records and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence which shows he was wounded in action or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.  In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding the Purple Heart.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008564





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008564



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005586

    Original file (20140005586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify the injury/wound was sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action, that the injury/wound required treatment by medical personnel, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was wounded as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017486

    Original file (20130017486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant provided an SF 600 which indicated he sustained a hand injury while serving on active duty in the RVN, this evidence does not conclusively show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021718

    Original file (20130021718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 7 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021718 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There are no medical records available which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. In the absence of such evidence, there is insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010216

    Original file (20130010216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he served in Vietnam from 1967 to 1968 and he never received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who was wounded in action against an armed enemy of the United States or as a direct result of an act of such enemy provided the wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. There are no available medical records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015467

    Original file (20140015467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013363

    Original file (20130013363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who was wounded in action against an armed enemy of the United States or as a direct result of an act of such enemy provided the wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), currently in effect, states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017557

    Original file (20130017557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 27 June 1967, shows he sustained a perforating wound to the cornea of his right eye when he was struck in the eye by a piece of bamboo at the 90th Replacement Battalion, Long Binh, Vietnam. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was clearing vegetation around a perimeter in Vietnam when he sustained an eye...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011135

    Original file (20140011135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 April 1966. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he (not his unit) was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004924

    Original file (20110004924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 26 October 1970 through 19 September 1971. There is no evidence in the available records showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007900

    Original file (20090007900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.