Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008290
Original file (20140008290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008290 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the former service member's (FSM) date of death and award of Survivor Benefits Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states the FSM was born on 20 November 1955 and died on 25 September 2012.  Her divorce decree included a provision for her receipt of benefits under the Uniformed Services Former Spouse's Protection Act (USFSPA), which she has not received.

3.  The applicant provides copies of –

* the FSM's death certificate
* their marriage certificate
* the FSM's 6 November 1992 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* their 29 July 1994 divorce decree

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM served on active duty from 4 December 1974 through 6 November 1992, when he was discharged with physical disability severance pay. 

2.  The applicant and the FSM were married on 6 May 1977 and divorced on 29 July 1994.

3.  The 1994 divorce decree provided that because the FSM failed to divide his severance pay, no child support was accessed against either party.  In accordance with the USFSPA, the applicant would receive 43.25 percent of the FSM's current or future military retirement benefits.  It was ordered that the FSM provide the applicant any military forms necessary for her to initiate and maintain any benefits she is entitled to under the USFSPA.

4.  The death certificate provided shows the FSM passed away on 25 September 2012.

5.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan and established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay (emphasis added) reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

6.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.  This law decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay (emphasis added) as community property in divorce cases if they so chose.  It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.  The USFSPA contains strict jurisdictional requirements.  The State court must have personal jurisdiction over the FSM by virtue of the FSM’s residence in the state (other than pursuant to military orders), domicile in the State, or consent.

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a retired service member to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has not provided or identified any document showing the FSM's  date of death as other than that shown on the death certificate, nor would correction of such an error in a civilian document be within the Board's authority.

2.  The available records do not contain any evidence that the FSM's discharge with disability severance pay was ever converted to retirement.

3.  Since the FSM was not retired, he was not entitled to retired pay and accordingly there was no share of retired pay to be given to the applicant.  Further, without receipt of retired pay an SBP annuity entitlement cannot be created.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008290



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008290



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019867

    Original file (20100019867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. It would now be appropriate to correct the injustice by showing the applicant requested a deemed election of the SBP under the terms of the divorce decree within 1 year of the divorce in 1994. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013171

    Original file (20100013171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her former spouse's records to show she made a deemed election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year of their divorce. d. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. f. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017236

    Original file (20100017236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity and life insurance policy. The FSM's records at DFAS show the FSM married Dawana on 16 December 1995. Therefore, in the event of the FSM's death, any SBP benefits would have to be paid to the beneficiary in effect at the time of death, his spouse, not his former spouse, if they had been married for at least...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002035C070208

    Original file (20040002035C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides 4 pages of their divorce decree; an undated DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1552) signed by the FSM; an Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage dated 23 May 2004 and signed by the applicant; and a Certificate of Appointment from the State of South Carolina, County of Richland Probate Court. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000832

    Original file (20120000832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The divorce decree stated the applicant was to receive the FSM’s SBP benefits and the FSM agreed to pay the premiums. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the FSM requested, in writing, to change his SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012875

    Original file (20060012875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage and that she be awarded the SBP annuity retroactive to the date of his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009572

    Original file (20080009572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 March 1993, the FSM and his spouse, the applicant were divorced. He did not do so, and although the applicant provided copies of letters that show she did make a request for a deemed election of the SBP for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law, there is no indication that these letters were received by DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015292C071029

    Original file (20060015292C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 21 May 2001, the FSM and the applicant divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. He and the applicant divorced in May 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016598

    Original file (20080016598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023708

    Original file (20100023708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record is void of any indication the FSM complied with the divorce decree to maintain SBP coverage for the applicant as "former spouse" and there is no indication the applicant requested a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the divorce. DFAS records show the FSM's SBP coverage designation at the time of his death was still "spouse only" and the FSM's widow is now the legal beneficiary of the SBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses...