Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007943
Original file (20140007943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 December 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007943 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of block 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his period of honorable service.

2.  The applicant states:

* he served honorably from 8 June 1976 until late June 1977
* he was involved in an altercation with two noncommissioned officers who put their hands on his face, after which he punched them
* he realizes his actions were wrong and he has been duly punished for them
* the period of honorable service prior to this altercation should be annotated in the Remarks section of his DD Form 214 to allow for receipt of benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Following 25 days of service in the U.S. Army Reserve, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 8 June 1976.  His records show he completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 05F (Radio Teletypewriter Operator).

3.  On 20 July 1977, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10.

4.  On 5 August 1977, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 1 month, and 28 days of active service and 25 days of inactive service.

5.  His records contain no evidence of reenlistments or additional periods of active service.

6.  The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board requesting a change in the character of his service and his request was denied on 30 April 1981.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed preparation of the DD Form 214.  A DD Form 214 would be issued to all personnel at the time of retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army.  Effective 1 October 1979, the DD Forms 214 would no longer be issued for enlisted members who were discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA and all service would be continuous from the date the last DD Form 214 was issued.

8.  Army Regulation 635-8 (Separation Processing and Documents), currently in effect, prescribes policy and procedural guidance related to transition management and explains separation document preparation, distribution, correction, and transition processing.  Chapter 5 provides guidance regarding preparation of separation documents.

	a.  Paragraph 5-6 provides detailed instructions for data required in each block of the DD Form 214.  Paragraph 5-6r advises that the Remarks section will be used for conditional entries or for Headquarters, Department of Army, mandatory requirements when a separate block is not available or as a continuation for entries in the following blocks:

* Command to Which Transferred
* Primary Specialty
* Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized
* Military Education

	b.  Conditional entries that will be annotated in the Remarks section include the following:

		(1)  For enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, enter "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD" and specify inclusive dates for each period of reenlistment.

		(2)  For Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except honorable, enter "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM (first day of service for which DD Form 214 was not issued) UNTIL (date before commencement of current enlistment)."  Then, enter the specific periods of reenlistment as prescribed above.

		c.  Paragraph 5-6x directs the characterization of service to be annotated in that specific block.  Characterization or description of service is determined by the directive authorizing the separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for annotation of his honorable service from 8 June 1976 through late June 1977 in the Remarks section of his DD Form 214 was carefully considered.

2.  He voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for which he was discharged under other than honorable conditions.

3.  Block 9e (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 is appropriately annotated to show "under other than honorable conditions." 

4.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, did not provide for entries annotating prior periods of honorable service.  Army Regulation 635-8, currently in effect, allows for the annotation of characterization of service in the Remarks section of the DD Form 214 only for Soldiers who previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except honorable.  However, he did not complete any period of honorable active service or reenlist for a period of active service without being issued a DD Form 214.

5.  There are no other regulatory provisions for annotating honorable periods of service in the Remarks section of the DD Form 214.

6.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007943



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007943



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002529

    Original file (20090002529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 MC issued at this time shows the applicant served on active duty for six months during this period. Under the earlier provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, the applicant was properly issued DD Forms 214 for his periods of service from 19 September 1972 through 25 November 1973, from 28 July 1976 through 21 December 1977, and 22 December 1977 through 29 November 1978. The applicant is correct that the DOE on the 31 July 1996 DD Form 214 is in error; however, the correct DOE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008858

    Original file (20100008858.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 30 years and 9 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement reflects that he had 2 months and 21 days of total inactive service. Accordingly, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 by adding his service in the DEP from 31 December 1976 to 21 March 1977 to the Remarks section of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020123

    Original file (20140020123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his total foreign service of 3 years and 6 months and to remove the statement: "DISCHARGE UPGRADED ON AUGUST 23, 1991 FOLLOWING APPLICATION DATED FEBRUARY 9, 1990" from the remarks section. The applicant provides his two DD Forms 214. This foreign service period should cover the remainder of his foreign service in Germany while completing his first tour from 5 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012333

    Original file (20140012333 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his 28 April 1977 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he received a high school diploma (in 1975) and two years of college credit (as of 1979), and also his service in Korea. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he completed any additional civilian education prior to his discharge on 28 April 1977. c. Item 20 of his 28 April 1977 DD Form 214 shows he completed 11 years of high school and zero (0) years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017270

    Original file (20080017270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 9 December 1976, in which the immediate commander requested and was granted a waiver of the applicant’s physical test portion of his basic combat training due to a temporary physical profile that was awarded on 24 November 1976 for a period of 21 days for a dislocated knee cap and that the applicant was cleared to ship. On 10 February 1977, the applicant’s unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020813

    Original file (20140020813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to honorable or, if this is not possible, he would like DD Forms 214 showing his prior honorable discharges. However, for Soldiers who previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and who are being separated with any characterization of service except "honorable," the following statement will appear as the first entry in the remarks block: "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM (first day of service for which a DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088562C070403

    Original file (2003088562C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant completed 3 months of active duty service completing his ADT between 18 June and 17 September 1976. Further, there is no indication that this active duty service was documented in a DD Form 214 or that it was accounted for in the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his retirement on 30 April 1997. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000182

    Original file (20130000182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was voluntarily discharged for personal reasons. On 16 November 1977, his immediate commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-37 (Expeditious Discharge Program). The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025124

    Original file (20110025124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 6 April 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37, under the EDP and his service was characterized as under honorable conditions (general). The applicant had requested the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgrade his discharge to an honorable discharge. (3) Item 25 of the applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he did not have a valid personnel security investigation status at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017270

    Original file (20140017270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 9c (Authority and Reason) to reflect the authority and reason for his separation * Item 9e (Character of Service) from under other than honorable conditions discharge * Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show letters of recommendation from the company commander, boot camp at...