Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007492
Original file (20140007492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007492 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests remission of indebtedness resulting from the recoupment of his bonus.

2.  The applicant states:

* he is unable to work due to his service-related disability
* he has a family of five to support
* he has no means with which to repay the debt

3.  The applicant provides:

* U.S. Army Human Resources Command memorandum disapproving his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness
* Social Security Administration Retirement, Survivors and Disability Insurance Notice of Award
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision
* VA Form 21-0958 (Notice of Disagreement)
* VA Form 21-526EZ (Application for Disability Compensation and Related Compensation Benefits)
* DA Form 3508 (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness)
* DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement)
* Bonus Recoupment worksheet
* DFAS-IN Form 0-641 (Statement of Military Pay Account)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 14 September 2005 following prior service in the U.S. Navy, the applicant was appointed as an officer in the Army and ordered to active duty as a first lieutenant (1LT) in the Corps of Engineers.

2.  On 28 September 2007, the applicant signed a Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Army Officer Menu of Incentives Contract agreeing to an active duty service obligation (ADSO) of 3 years in exchange for the designation of Finance Branch as his branch/functional area of choice.  The applicant served the required ADSO incurred through receipt of this incentive.

3.  The applicant served in Iraq from 2 June 2011 through 1 June 2012.  While deployed, it appears the applicant received an Officer Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) of $30,000.00 on 26 May 2012, incurring an obligated service commitment of 60 months as reflected in the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Bonus Recoupment worksheet.

4.  Although the applicant's signed contract from 26 May 2012 is not available for review, such contracts contain the following standard acknowledgements and statements of understanding, as evidenced in the applicant's previously-signed contract from 2007:

	a.  I understand that the ADSO incurred will be served in addition to any other non-statutory ADSO.

	b.  Requests for release from active duty or voluntary retirement with an effective date during the period of this agreement will be disapproved except where considered to be in the best interest of the Army.

	c.  In the event of termination, unearned CSRB payments will be recouped by the government and shall be subject to the repayment provisions of Title 37, U.S. Code, section 303a(e), based on the length of CSRB active duty obligation actually served, unless the failure to complete the period of active duty specified in the agreement is due to:

		(1)  death or disability that is not the result of misconduct or willful neglect and not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence or

		(2)  separation from the military service by operation of law or regulation of the Department of Defense or the Army when waiver for recoupment has been approved by the Secretary of the Army.

5.  On 19 July 2012, the applicant submitted a request for resignation in lieu of elimination and his resignation was accepted by the Department of Army Ad Hoc Review Board on 13 October 2012.

6.  On 24 October 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges), paragraphs 4-2b and 4-24a(1).  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflects a separation code of BNC (Misconduct and Moral or Professional Dereliction).

7.  The DFAS-IN Form 0-641, generated on 4 December 2012, reflects a debt computation of $17,298.33 due to the recoupment of $27,516.67 of the applicant's CSRB, the amount of which was based on his remaining unserved obligated days.  The reason for debt states:  "Recoupment is required for the unearned portion of your enlistment or reenlistment bonus based on your separation code BNC.  Your enlistment [sic] contract obligated you to perform duty through 05/27/2017  [25 May 2017] and at separation you had 1651 unserved days [4 years, 7 months, and 1 day]."

8.  The applicant filed a disability claim with the VA that was received by that office on 30 November 2012.  His VA Rating Decision, dated 8 May 2013, reflects the following determination:

* service connection for degenerative disc disease, lumbar spine, is granted with an evaluation of 20 percent effective 25 October 2012
* service connection for radiculopathy (irritation or injury to a nerve root), left lower extremity, is granted with an evaluation of 10 percent effective 25 October 2012
* service connection for synovitis (inflammation of connective tissue membrane) and metatarsalgia (cramping pain where the metatarsal foot bones meet toe bones), left foot, is granted with an evaluation of 10 percent effective 25 October 2012
* service connection for closed fracture, left fifth finger proximal interphalangeal joint, is granted with an evaluation of 0 percent effective 25 October 2012
* service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder is denied

9.  The applicant filed a Notice of Disagreement with the VA on 9 August 2013 requesting service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder.  The VA response to his follow-up application is not available for review and was not provided by the applicant.

10.  On 22 January 2014, the applicant submitted a DA Form 3508 requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness which states, in effect:

* he is unable to repay the debt and simultaneously provide for his family
* he relies on his parents for financial support
* he is unable to perform manual labor due to his service-related back injuries
* he filed for bankruptcy in order to feed his family

11.  On 21 February 2014, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command disapproved his application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness.  The review determined no grounds exist to remit or cancel the debt based on hardship and/or injustice.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records indicate the applicant received a $30,000.00 CSRB on 26 May 2012 which obligated him to a 60-month ADSO.

2.  While not available for review, it must be presumed that his contract advised him of recoupment of the unearned portion of the incentive in the event of failure to fulfill the required ADSO.

3.  He voluntarily requested resignation in lieu of elimination on 19 July 2012, less than 2 months after approval of the CSRB.

4.  He was honorably discharged from the Army on 24 October 2012 and assigned a separation code of BNC (Misconduct and Moral or Professional Dereliction), following which DFAS assessed a debt against him for the unearned portion of the CRSC as his contract obligated him to perform duty through 25 May 2017.

5.  He filed a disability claim with the VA and received a cumulative rating of 
40-percent service-connected disability on 8 May 2013.  Service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder was denied.

6.  He asserted in his request for remission of debt that he is unable to work, thus he cannot adequately provide for his family.  He stated he is unable to repay the debt and he never expected to get out of the Army.

7.  The applicant voluntarily requested resignation in lieu of elimination a mere 54 days after approval of the CSRB incentive, receipt of which required a 5-year ADSO.  He was well aware of the potential impending elimination action brought on by his own personal misconduct that transpired well prior to receipt of the CSRB bonus.

8.  There are no grounds to remit or cancel the debt based on hardship and/or injustice.

9.  Based on the available evidence, recoupment of his CSRB is proper and he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007492



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007492



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010808

    Original file (20080010808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records further show that, while attending the FA Basic Officer Course at the U.S. Army FA School, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the FA Corps of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and executed an oath office on 14 August 1999. Several facts are stated which he does not question, such as [Applicant] submitted a CSRB contract requesting Tier III ($35,000) incentive as a FA officer; he is a branch detailed officer, and accessed as a SC officer as presented in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014930

    Original file (20120014930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of his bonus debt. On 25 October 2010, officials of the NEARNG informed the applicant that he did not sign his bonus addendum at the time of his extension and thus was not eligible for a bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all State ARNG and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing a portion of his debt was waived and pro-rating the applicant’s debt and recouping only that amount due for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015582

    Original file (20110015582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 February 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015582 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * his unit failed to provide him a hearing before an administrative separation board, as he was entitled to given his years of service; therefore, he was improperly separated and his under honorable conditions (general) discharge was improper * throughout his discharge proceedings, his chain of command failed to consider his mental and medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017108

    Original file (20130017108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests cancellation of the financial recoupment action pertaining to his Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus. He also signed a NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Reenlistment /Extension Bonus Addendum) which states termination of his bonus would occur without recoupment if he accepted a MILTECH position or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position and on the effective date of his orders had served at least 6 months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245

    Original file (20120021245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011511

    Original file (20130011511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, cancellation of any recoupment actions for the first installment payment of $10,000 minus taxes of a $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) he already received. His Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment Bonus Addendum Army National Guard of the United States) confirms: * he enlisted for a critical skill MOS (15T) with authorization for a $20,000.00 bonus * he would receive the first bonus payment of 50 percent of the total authorized amount...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008764

    Original file (20120008764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests cancellation/remittance of his Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) recoupment. He goes on to state he was granted a transfer to the ING for 2 years with a return date of 1 January 2012 and he returned to duty in December 2011 after 23 months in the ING. He has not shown through the evidence of record or the evidence submitted with his application that his debt is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008278

    Original file (20140008278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The CG stated the action was based on two referred Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs) for the periods 21 July 2010 to 9 May 2011 and 18 May 2011 to 7 February 2012 that were filed in his Official Military Personnel File. After considering all matters in the applicant's case, to include his rebuttal statement, his chain of command recommended his elimination from the Army prior to the expiration of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089888C070403

    Original file (2003089888C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted in the Army in order to take advantage of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) and after completing his training he was informed that his loans did not qualify for payment under the LRP. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, any basis for suspending or remitting the debt owed the government for the unearned portion of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020404

    Original file (20130020404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An NGB official stated although the applicant was eligible for the CSRB with the INARNG on 6 December 2008 in the critical AOC of 25A, he failed to sign a CSRB Written Agreement. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, dated 12 December 2007, approved payment of bonus to ARNG and USAR officers who agree to serve in an active status for not less than 3 years in certain AOCs designated as critical for the CSRB in accordance with Title 37, U.S. Code, section 323. As a result, the...