Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007229
Original file (20140007229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 December 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007229 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he earned the CIB but it does not appear on his DD Form 214.  He was under fire from the Chinese on several occasions.  He received combat pay and was assigned to Company M, 31st Infantry Regiment, in 1952.

3.  The applicant provides two copies of his DD Form 214 and a letter from the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA).  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provide in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of the cases and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are sufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations.
2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 16 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed his records were destroyed in that fire.  However, his available DD Form 214 contains sufficient information for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The available military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 June 1951.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 1816 (Personnel Administrative Supervisor). 

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 5 June 1953 and transferred to the Enlisted Reserve Corps after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 17 days of net active service and 1 year, 5 months, and 15 days of foreign service.  His    DD Form 214 lists in:

* Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – the:

* Army of Occupation Medal (Japan)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* United Nations Service Medal
* two overseas service bars

* Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) – 31st Infantry Regiment, 7th Division

5.  There are no available orders that authorized or awarding him the CIB during this period of service. 

6.  He provides a copy of a letter from ARBA, dated 13 March 2014, wherein he was advised that his prior request for relief had been administratively closed without prejudice, due to the absence of his military records, which were believed to have been lost in the fire of 1973.  In the absence of record evidence to the contrary, it was presumed what the Army did in his case was correct.  The burden of proving otherwise was his responsibility.  He could reapply at any time if he could submit his separation document and any other necessary supporting documents he felt would substantiate his case.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to an infantryman Soldier satisfactorily performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participate in such ground combat.  Campaign or battle credit alone is not sufficient for award of the CIB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant completed training, was awarded MOS 1816, and served in Korea.  He was assigned to an infantry unit at the time; however, there is no available evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence that shows he personally participated in active ground combat during his service in Korea or that he held an infantry MOS.  

2.  To be entitled to award of the CIB, the evidence must show he held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size, and he must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to this infantry unit during his period of service in Vietnam.

3.  In the absence of orders awarding him the CIB and evidence showing he met all the criteria for this award, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base awarding him the CIB and its addition to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 







are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007229





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007229



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015287

    Original file (20090015287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the RVN from 27 July 1967 to 4 June 1968. His DD Form 214 only reflects one overseas service bar; therefore, his records should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and one overseas service bar; b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025098

    Original file (20110025098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of his late father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The FSM's WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) shows he served with the 31st Infantry on Bataan as a Supply Clerk for about 3 months before 7 December 1941. There is no evidence of record, and the picture the applicant provided is insufficient evidence, to show his father was awarded and served in an infantry MOS during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012983

    Original file (20110012983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. The applicant's infantry MOS and/or his service in Vietnam are not in question. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002242

    Original file (20090002242.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and saw and participated in combat. He also states that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for being wounded in action, but his unit never awarded him the CIB for his service in combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020613

    Original file (20140020613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140020613 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the CIB and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the KDSM to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027799

    Original file (20100027799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, his statement indicates the applicant was a combat engineer and demolition specialist attached to an engineer detachment in Vietnam, not an infantryman in an infantry unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022019

    Original file (20120022019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. he was awarded the CIB in Japan following his service in Korea while assigned to the 65th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Division; and b. his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) should be corrected to add this forgotten award. The CIB is not listed on his DD Form 214 and there are no orders or other documents in the NPRC file that indicate the applicant was recommended for or awarded the CIB during his tenure on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004856

    Original file (20130004856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 further shows: a. he was honorably discharged on 18 April 1953; b. he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 6 days of net active service, including 1 year, 4 months and 12 days of foreign service; c. his most significant duty assignment was in MOS 1824 (Mess Steward) with the 58th Signal Support Company; however, it does not provide any evidence of his foreign unit of assignment; and d. he was awarded or authorized the: * Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007374

    Original file (20090007374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was recommended for and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for his heroic action on 18 November 1967 and that as an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in the Republic of Vietnam, he should have received the CIB. Item 32 (Prior Service) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record) shows that on the date of his discharge for the purpose of reenlistment, he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.07 (Infantryman) and was assigned to Company D,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010888

    Original file (20140010888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A letter of support, signed by the same individual who recommended the applicant's reassignment in the RVN, states that the applicant served in his command as a squad leader. The author states the applicant earned the CIB for his service in the RVN. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.