IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 May 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140007122
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.
2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.
3. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.
2. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination.
2. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), section 4.129, were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD, section 4.130.
3. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The available evidence of record showed that during processing through the military DES, no change in diagnosis was made at any time. The SRP determined that since no MH diagnoses were changed throughout the disability evaluation, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the MH review project terms of reference.
4. The SRP agreed the 10-percent rating for the residual cognitive disorder (dementia) due to a traumatic brain injury was supported by the evidence of the record. The SRP discussed a fitness determination for the major depressive disorder condition. The threshold for countering fitness determinations was higher than the VASRD, section 4.3 (reasonable doubt), standard used for its rating recommendations, but remained adherent to the DOD Instruction 6040.44 "fair and equitable" standard. The applicant's diagnosis of depression was not implicated in the commander's statement or in his permanent profile. The applicant was not judged, either by the medical evaluation board (MEB) or by the PEB, to fail retention standards due to depression. The SRP also agreed that the evidence of record reflected no occupational and social impairment due to depression in the period of time leading to the MEB.
5. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded the depression condition was not unfitting at the time of separation and was not subject to a service disability rating.
6. The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140007122
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011248
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also considered if the diagnosis should be changed. The SRP determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to support a change in the diagnosis.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007873
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted the diagnosis of anxiety disorder was noted on the profile and physical and not recorded at the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and subsequently not adjudicated by the PEB; therefore, this diagnosis was eliminated. After due deliberation in consideration of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009102
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010712
The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. In the service treatment record notes and at the VA C&P MH exam the applicant reported his main stressor during deployment was separation from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006952
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. Review of the Post-Deployment Health Assessment, service treatment records following return from deployment, and primary MH treatment records at the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010501
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP directed attention to its recommendations and its first assessment with regard to the MH condition, under MH Review guidelines, was to judge (based on a preponderance of evidence) whether an MH diagnosis was changed or unfairly eliminated during the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010724
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. Neither examiner felt that there were symptoms attributable to PTSD and the SRP concluded that there was not a preponderance of evidence to support any change in the diagnosis considered by the PEB to PTSD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000289
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010511
The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRPs charge with respect to MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEBs fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011229
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section...