Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006977
Original file (20140006977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006977 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the transfer of his unused education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* he did not receive notification of the requirements to transfer his Post-
9/11 GI Bill benefits until he was preparing to transition for retirement in October 2013; the window for transferring education benefits closed in August 2013
* he learned the only way to be able to transfer his education benefit was to extend his retirement date; his request for extension was disapproved
* a major reason why he did not get the word was he was embedded for 
6 years with the Central Intelligence Agency involved in discrete counter-terrorism operations; this meant he was relatively out of touch with what was happening in the Army
* the loss of this benefit will cost him and his family hundreds of thousands of dollars

3.  The applicant provides:

* packet requesting change of a previously-approved retirement
* DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report)
* 3 DA Forms 1613 (Records Cross Reference)
* DA Form 1059-1 (Civilian Institution Academic Evaluation Report)
* certificate of completion for the U.S. Army War College
* letter of commendation
* DA Form 4037 (Officer Record Brief)
* Orders 157-0002, U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired from the Regular Army on 28 February 2014.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he completed 26 years and 14 days of creditable active military service.

2.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible member is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute.

3.  A Soldier must be currently serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve, on or after 1 August 2009, at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her family members.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement.

2.  The DOD, VA, and the Army conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  Since the applicant was on active duty at the time of program implementation in August 2009, and continued on active duty through his retirement in February 2014, he had sufficient time to submit his application and there is no evidence he exercised due diligence.
3.  The requirements of this program are set in the law and any changes to the law are not within the purview of this Board.  Based upon the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006977





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006977



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000223

    Original file (20150000223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is not much he can give his children who followed him during their growing-up years and had to be uprooted during high school because he was again being transferred * receiving the educational benefits is one small way he can demonstrate his appreciation for the sacrifices they made during his career * he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time it was first authorized in June 2009 because he already had a master's degree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017881

    Original file (20140017881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to family members. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty until his disability retirement on 26 January 2012. As he had over 10 years of active duty service, he would have been eligible to transfer any unused education benefits to his eligible family members through the TEB database.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011075

    Original file (20130011075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving as a member of the USAR in the rank of LTC until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 30 November 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000172

    Original file (20150000172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post -9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement, and in fact, he attempted to transfer his education benefits in the TEB website on 21 July 2010. His retirement date was 31 August 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant properly completed and submitted his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013482

    Original file (20130013482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the service member allocates 0 months and subsequently leaves military service they are not authorized to transfer unused benefits; and d. a Soldier not serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve and subsequently requests the transfer of unused benefits to family members should not be granted relief based on unawareness of law, program rules, or procedures unless they left the service during the implementation phase (first 90 days) of the program. A Soldier must be on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013606

    Original file (20140013606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's two sons each used education benefits the applicant transferred to them under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer her educational benefits to her dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to her retirement. She incurred an additional service obligation as a result of her approved request to transfer her education benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012473

    Original file (20140012473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he applied online to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his children while serving in Iraq in 2009 * at the time he had over 18 years of service in the Army * he was under the impression that the online transfer went through, as the website at the time indicated, but now he thinks something must have gotten lost in the chaos of the situation * he received paperwork from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) stating he had been allocated 36 months of the...