Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006969
Original file (20140006969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006969 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in the right hand by shrapnel in a firefight in Vietnam on 4 April 1967 and was treated by medical personnel at the base camp.  He received a tetanus shot which is reflected on his service records.  He turned down award of the Purple Heart at the time of the incident because of the traumatic event of losing his team leader; however, he now wishes he had not turned it down.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his medical treatment records and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1966 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman.  He completed his basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana and his advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia before being transferred to Vietnam on 30 November 1966 for assignment to Company A, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment.  

3.  He departed Vietnam on 28 November 1967 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado for assignment Company C, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment.

4.  On 25 July 1968, he was transferred back to Vietnam with his unit and served there until 11 June 1969 when he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington and was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee on 15 June 1969.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active duty and his 
DD Form 214 issued at the time shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and Army Commendation Medal.

5.  A review of his official records failed to reveal any evidence of the applicant being wounded as a result of enemy action and treatment being made a matter of record.  Additionally, his name is not contained on the Vietnam Casualty Listing.

6.  The medical records he provides shows he received a tetanus shot in April 1967.  However, it also shows he received a tetanus shot in June 1966 and in August 1966.  His chronological record of medical care does not show he received treatment in April 1967.  His separation Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) does not show he received any illness or injury.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record fails to show treatment for his injuries was made a matter of record.  

2.  While the applicant has provided copies of his medical treatment records in support of his request, they do not contain evidence of injuries as a result of enemy action and are not sufficient to overcome the lack of any supporting evidence in the available records.

3.  Therefore, absent such evidence, there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006969



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006969



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005048

    Original file (20090005048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. The statements of support provided by the applicant's former fellow Soldier were considered; however, the applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Listing and there were no entries made in his service records to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action. The SF 88 and 89 that were prepared at the time of the applicant's separation physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018181

    Original file (20070018181.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show award of the Purple Heart. AR 600-8-22 also provides that there are no time limitations for requests for award of the Purple Heart. Given that the applicant did not receive orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his name is not on the Vietnam Casualty List, and nothing in his official records shows he was wounded, the preponderance of evidence weighs against awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004493

    Original file (20150004493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150004493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides * self-authored statement * Standard Form (SF) 601 (Immunization Record) * page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DD Form 214 * letter, dated 3 April 2015, to the applicant from the Army Review Boards Agency * letter, dated 23 April 2015, to the applicant from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with enclosure (Patient Inquiry) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000219

    Original file (20150000219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. In order to support award of the Purple Heart, the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. However, his record contains insufficient medical treatment records or other documents which confirm he was wounded as a result of enemy action or treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018909

    Original file (20120018909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012154

    Original file (20140012154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The ROP stated that his medical records were not available for the time he was in Vietnam and that his personnel records were void of nearly all documentation related to Vietnam. He has the Army Commendation Medal, shrapnel still in his arm, and the Board states he needs more proof. There is no available evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence provided showing he show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002885

    Original file (20090002885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he received a shrapnel wound to his chin on 25 August 1966 during the Battle of Bong Trang while serving in the RVN. In his request the applicant claims he received a shrapnel wound to his chin on 25 August 1966 during the Battle of Bong Trang while serving in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025817

    Original file (20100025817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim for the Purple Heart, he provided service medical records which show he was treated for a right leg wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the service medical records provided by the applicant state "old shrapnel wound" to right calf, there is insufficient evidence to show he was injured as a result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009087

    Original file (20070009087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows the applicant was involved in a tussle and not in a firefight. There were no entries made in his service personnel records to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action and no orders were published to award him the Purple Heart for a wound he may have received on 18 July 1968. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant the Vietnam Service Medal, with four...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008119

    Original file (20100008119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the date on his Purple Heart certificate from 3 January 1966 to 3 January 1967 and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. Although the applicant contends he was wounded on 26 December 1966, his service record does not contain sufficient evidence which confirms he was wounded on this date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...