Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006839
Original file (20140006839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  10 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006839 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)).

2.  The applicant states the Article 15 should be a local punishment and not follow the service member.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  With prior enlisted service in the Regular Army (RA), the applicant reenlisted in the RA for 3 years on 30 July 2003, in pay grade E-2.  He is currently on active duty due to continuous reenlistments.  He has been promoted through the ranks to pay grade E-6.

3.  The applicant was assigned to Fort Benning, GA on 14 March 2011, when he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being derelict in the performance of his duties and for negligently failing to monitor the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) Tactical Operations Center at Shelby Hill.  The DA Form 2627 he received shows he elected not demand trial by court-martial and in an open hearing, he pled guilty of all specifications.  His commanding officer directed that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF.

4.  A review of the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF shows the DA Form 2627 contained therein.

5.  Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) provides the applicable policies for administration of NJP.  The regulation states that NJP may be imposed to correct, educate, and reform offenders whom the imposing commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a Soldier’s record of service from unnecessary stigma by a record of court-martial conviction; or to further military efficiency by disposing of minor offenses in a manner requiring less time and personnel than trial by court-martial.  All Article 15 actions, including notification, acknowledgment, imposition, filing determinations, appeal, action on appeal, or any other action taken prior to action being taken on an appeal, except summarized proceedings, are recorded on a DA Form 2627.  The regulation also states that absent compelling evidence, a properly completed, valid DA Form 2627 will not be removed from a Soldier’s record.

	a.  Chapter 3 states that a commander will personally exercise discretion in the nonjudicial process by evaluating the case to determine whether proceedings under Article 15 should be initiated, determining whether the Soldier committed the offense(s) where Article 15 proceedings are initiated and the Soldier does not demand trial by court-martial, and determining the amount and nature of any punishment if punishment is appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-18(l) states that punishment will not be imposed unless the commander is convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the Soldier committed the offense(s).  If the imposing commander decides to impose punishment, ordinarily the commander will announce the punishment to the Soldier.  The commander may, if the commander desires to do so, explain to the Soldier why a particular punishment was imposed.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  

2.  However, according to the applicable regulation, all Article 15 actions, including notification, acknowledgment, imposition, filing determinations, appeal, action on appeal, or any other action taken prior to action being taken on an appeal, except summarized proceedings, are recorded on a DA Form 2627.  

3.  The regulation also states that absent compelling evidence, a properly completed, valid DA Form 2627 will not be removed from a Soldier’s record.

4.  The DA Form 2627 he received shows he elected not to demand trial by court-martial and in an open hearing, he pled guilty of all specifications.  His commanding officer directed that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF and the applicant has failed to show error or injustice in the action taken by the Army in his case.  

5.  The fact that he believes that the Article 15 should have been filed locally is an insufficient justification for granting the requested relief.

6.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006839



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006839



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020811

    Original file (20100020811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The DA Form 2627 with continuation sheet shows: * on 15 May 2008 he willfully disobeyed a lawful command from a senior commissioned officer * on 16 May 2008 he failed to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty * on 6 July 2008 he willfully disobeyed a lawful order from a senior NCO * on18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017018

    Original file (20090017018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 12 December 2001, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The evidence of record confirms that the applicant elected not to demand a trial by court-martial and chose to have his case disposed of through Article 15 proceedings at a closed hearing with his commander. The evidence of record further shows that this DA Form 2627 is properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022149

    Original file (20110022149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The decision to file the original DA Form 2627 in the performance section or restricted section of the OMPF will be made by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states that applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022149 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007825

    Original file (20100007825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show his first Article 15 was placed in the performance section of his OMPF in September 2004. There is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence to show that keeping the DA Form 2627 in the performance section of his OMPF is unjust. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007825 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007825 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018865

    Original file (20090018865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 22 April 2009 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); and b. On 29 April 2009, a Senior Defense Counsel submitted an appeal of the applicant’s Article 15 and stated the following: * the Article 15 process was conducted in a highly inappropriate manner * the imposing commander completed the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) recommendation 5 days prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008512

    Original file (20090008512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 26 April 2006, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 3-43 of the military justice regulation contains guidance on the transfer or removal of records of NJP (DA Form 2627) from the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014197

    Original file (20090014197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The imposing commander directed this Article 15 be filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF. The evidence of record further shows that this DA Form 2627 is properly filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF as directed by the imposing commander. The applicant is currently an SFC/E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140019460

    Original file (AR20140019460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that applications for removal of an Article 15 from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It further indicates that there must be clear and compelling evidence to support the removal of a properly-completed, facially-valid DA Form 2627 from a Soldier's record by the ABCMR. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019460 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002295

    Original file (20080002295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the non-judicial punishment (NJP) action imposed on him under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 4 November 2003 be set-aside; and that the Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627) be removed from his record. Paragraph 3-43 of the military justice regulation contains guidance on the transfer or removal of records of NJP (DA Form 2627) from the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013447

    Original file (20120013447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) dated 23 February 2009 from her official military personnel file (OMPF) and restoration of her rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant provides the following documents: * Contested Article 15 * Self-authored article from a junior member of her squad * Character reference letter * Recommendation for restoration of rank * Three-day pass...