Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006455
Original file (20140006455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  18 December 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006455 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:

* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 caliber)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar 
(M-60)
* all other awards he may be entitled

2.  He states he completed Military Police training which required weapons qualification with the .45 caliber pistol and the M-60 machine gun.  He adds that considering his 17-month deployment in Asia during the Vietnam War, he believes he qualifies for additional awards.

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice))
* National Personnel Records Center letter, dated 1 June 2009



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1971.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Policeman).  He was later awarded MOS 91G (Social Work Specialist).  He served in Okinawa from 22 May 1972 to 3 October 1973 and was honorably released from active duty on 4 October 1973 as an overseas returnee.  He was credited with
1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of total active service.

3.  His DA Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal.

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 shows he qualified as expert with the M-16 Rifle.

5.  His record is void of any evidence that shows he qualified as expert or marksman with the pistol or machine gun.  There are no orders or evidence that show he is entitled to any additional awards.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course, and an appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.  The qualification badges are in three classes:  Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman.  Additionally, the regulation states the qualification should be shown as:  Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar or Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar or Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.  Orders are not required for award of the marksmanship badges; however, marksmanship badges may be announced via memorandum, letter, roster, or other locally devised form by the approval authority.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DA Form 20 verifies that he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) which is not listed on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this badge.

2.  There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any to show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 caliber) or the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60).  Therefore, in absence of documentation to verify these badges, the presumption of regularity must be applied. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding to his DD Form 214 the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar or the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60).



      __________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006455





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006455



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005530

    Original file (20130005530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He subsequently served in Korea from March 1963 to April 1964. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was awarded or authorized the: * 2nd Class Gunner Marksmanship Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 caliber) * Vietnam Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge 12. There is no evidence, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018728

    Original file (20100018728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although his record does not contain a copy of the orders awarding him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), it is apparent from the entry on his DA Form 2475 that he qualified with the weapon. His record is void of any evidence to show he qualified with the .45 caliber pistol; therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber). The Board further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015103

    Original file (20110015103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber), Machine Gun Bar (M-60), and Shot Gun Bar * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006894

    Original file (20120006894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on this information, the applicant's request for the Cold War Recognition Certificate will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). With respect to the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), this badge is recorded on his DA Form 2-1 and is already listed on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005994

    Original file (20120005994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Machine Gun, and Pistol Bars. The evidence of record show the applicant qualified for the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017808

    Original file (20090017808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60) * award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * award of "wings" * he received a letter of appreciation and a letter of commendation * his rank/pay grade at the time of his relief from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021620

    Original file (20140021620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain any evidence that shows he qualified with or was awarded weapons qualification badges for the M-16 rifle or .50 caliber and M-60 machine guns. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record shows no evidence of special orders that announced award of additional weapons qualification badges nor were there entries on his DA Form 20 to indicate he qualified with the M-16 rifle or the .50 caliber and M-60 machine...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004037

    Original file (20120004037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the training and qualifications received during his military service should be recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, item 25 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) to item 24 of his DD Form 214 and b. adding the entry "Advanced Individual Training,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002259

    Original file (20110002259.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his military service, and he was promoted to sergeant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period of service from 14 September 1961 to 12 September 1964. In addition, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003857

    Original file (20140003857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-1) Rifle Bar, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (.45 Caliber) Pistol Bar. He also served a qualifying period of service for award of the NDSM and to have this award added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the...