Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006082
Original file (20140006082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  9 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006082 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was awarded the badge, but he never received it since he was evacuated to Okinawa
* he left Vietnam early
* he would like to have the badge for his grandson

3.  The applicant provides:

* a Headquarters, 1st Infantry Brigade, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized) letter, dated 27 July 1971
* Combat Medical Badge orders
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 November 1969 for 2 years.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (medical specialist).  He arrived in Vietnam on 1 February 1971, where he served in MOS 91B while assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 77th Armor Regiment, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division, from 23 February 1971 until he was transferred to Okinawa on 15 April 1971 for medical treatment.  He participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam.

3.  Headquarters, 1st Infantry Brigade, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized) Special Orders Number 124, dated 4 May 1971, show he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge.

4.  A Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 10 July 1971, shows he underwent a parotidectomy (surgical excision of the parotid gland, the major and largest of the salivary glands) in Okinawa in April 1971.

5.  On 27 August 1971, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year and 9 months of creditable active service with no lost time.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-14 and 
M-16)

7.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no evidence of any disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows 1st Battalion, 77th Armor Regiment, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the period 8 February to 30 April 1971 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 42, dated 1972.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Special orders show the applicant was awarded the Combat Medical Badge.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this badge.

2.  He was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four with 1 year and 9 months of creditable active service with no lost time.  It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 28 November 1968 through 27 August 1971 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  He participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star.  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this service star.

4.  His unit in Vietnam was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award.



BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 November 1969 through 27 August 1971,

	b.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Combat Medical Badge
* one bronze service star for his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal

	c.  issuing him the Combat Medical Badge.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006082



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006082



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000900

    Original file (20130000900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His service records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Medical Badge and/or the Army Good Conduct Medal. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 24 March 1970 through 23 November 1971; b. deleting from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004494C070205

    Original file (20060004494C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of records show that the applicant was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam during in one campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show awards of the Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 16 September 1968 to 30 June 1971, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023814

    Original file (20100023814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Purple Heart. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show his wounds in item 40 (Wounds) and there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart in his records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013473

    Original file (20140013473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service) – he was credited with Vietnam service beginning on 10 November 1970 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) – * he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division, from 15 November 1970 through on or about 9 June 1971 * he was assigned as a patient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013296

    Original file (20070013296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the awards of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Presidential Unit Citation, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar. The applicant's record shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018245

    Original file (20070018245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge. The applicant states that he served as a medical specialist in the Republic of Vietnam but was never awarded the Combat Medical Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 25 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057977C070420

    Original file (2001057977C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded the ARCOM with V device while in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows that the applicant met the eligibility requirements for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 16 January 1970 – 21 August 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002806

    Original file (20110002806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, he is entitled to three bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006730C070205

    Original file (20060006730C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011027

    Original file (20070011027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 29 November 1973, shows he was awarded one award of the Army Commendation Medal. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by adding the already-awarded Army Commendation Medal, 1st OLC, to his DD Form 214 and to show award of the Republic of...