Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005908
Original file (20140005908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 December 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005908 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests amendment of the following forms:

* DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 22 April 1971
* DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation – Line of Duty and Misconduct Status), dated 3 June 1971

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He wants any mention of heroin use removed from his military records.

	b.  He turned himself in and President Nixon promised all Soldiers amnesty.  This should not be reflected in his records.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 261
* DA Form 2173
* self-authored statement, dated 29 May 1971

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 June 1969 for 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 62M (rough terrain forklift and loader operator).  He arrived in Vietnam on 24 October 1970.

3.  He provided a DA Form 2173, dated 22 April 1971, which contains the following entries pertaining to heroin use:

* heroin addiction
* patient acknowledges the use of heroin
* heroin use

4.  He provided a statement, dated 29 May 1971, wherein he stated he went to the Air Force Hospital and turned himself in under the amnesty program on or about 22 February 1971.  He stayed there for 4 days and was released on or about 26 February 1971.

5.  He also provided a DD Form 261, dated 3 June 1971, which states, "Heroin use; patient acknowledges use of heroin."  The investigating officer's finding of "not in the line of duty – due to own misconduct" was approved on 6 August 1971.

6.  He departed Vietnam on 31 October 1971.  On 11 January 1972, he was honorably released from active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, there is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any evidence which conclusively refutes the entries in question on the DA Form 2173 or DD Form 261.  In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the entries were correct.  Therefore, there is no basis to amend these forms.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005908



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005908



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012250

    Original file (20120012250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation – Line of Duty (LOD) and Misconduct Status), dated 12 December 1974, to show his injuries occurred in the LOD instead of not in the LOD due to own misconduct. According to the DA Form 2800 (U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation), as investigated by the El Paso Police Department (EPPD), the following facts are noted: * at approximately 0030 hours on 1 November 19974 at the High Tide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003391

    Original file (20120003391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show on the DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation - Line of Duty (LOD) and Misconduct Status), dated 4 June 2010, the FSM's death was "In Line of Duty" instead of "Not in Line of Duty - Due to Own Misconduct." The applicant states: * The FSM was reported in an authorized absence on the DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) and in an absent without leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009060

    Original file (20070009060.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009060 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The DD Form 261, dated 21 February 1972, showed the investigating officer completed his investigation of the accident and determined that the accident was not in the line of duty and was due to the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021748

    Original file (20100021748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing statements from a DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation – Line of Duty and Misconduct Status), dated 26 September 1967, and sworn statements associated with the DD Form 261. A DA Form 19-24, dated 23 September 1967, shows he made the following statement, "While using blank ammunition during a riot control training of a practice sniper attack, I was in the back of a five ton truck and seeing a fellow Soldier approaching I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017932

    Original file (20130017932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation - Line of Duty (LD) and Misconduct Status) be placed in the restricted portion of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) or be removed from his AMHRR. He provides: * DD Form 261 * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * memorandum, subject: Legal Review – LD Investigation, [Applicant] * e-mail * form entitled "CAP Data Sheet" * flyer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010591

    Original file (20080010591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request: a. reconstructed DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 15 September 1990; b. two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn statement), dated 15 September 1990 and 14 October 1990; c. memorandum, dated 7 June 2005, Joint Forces Headquarters, CAARNG, Sacramento, CA, subject: Line of Duty; d. memorandum, dated 14 June 2005, from the applicant to the Joint Forces Headquarters, CAARNG,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087427C070212

    Original file (2003087427C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020559

    Original file (20110020559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the investigating officer (IO) did not conduct a thorough investigation into the FSM's death * it appears the IO made his decision based on hearsay information told to the police officer at the scene of the accident * the IO stated in his findings that there was no toxicology examination and that is incorrect; additionally, the IO stated he did not interview any witnesses * the police report did not say alcohol was a factor in the accident's cause 3. In this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016754

    Original file (20140016754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 should reflect award of the Purple Heart * he was hospitalized in Saigon, Vietnam, in October 1969 for injuries sustained from an incoming mortar explosion, leaving him with shrapnel in his right shoulder * he was asked to go with other Soldiers from the hospital to the home of the Ambassador to Vietnam * he was attached to the 196th Infantry Division (sic) at the time 3. His records contain multiple documents, to include Western Union telegrams,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020685

    Original file (20120020685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the LOD investigation was not done in accordance with Army Regulations (AR) 600-8-4 and 15-6 in that it did not take into account the FSM's mental state at the time of his death. COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 December 2011, the applicant notified the FSM's son via the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), that after careful review of the LOD investigation, a final determination was made that the FSM's death was "Not in Line of Duty" at the time...