Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005887
Original file (20140005887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  30 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005887 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his family member under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he was not aware of the new rules.  He retired in 2004.

3.  The applicant does not provide any evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having had prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and commissioned officer service in the Regular Army, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and executed an oath of office on 30 August 1986.

3.  He served in a variety of assignments and he was advanced to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC).

4.  On 19 February 2003, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter).

5.  On 18 May 2004, Headquarters, U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC published orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve effective 2 June 2004. 

6.  Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve.

7.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  With prior active and ARNG service, the applicant served in an active status in the U.S. Army Reserve from 31 August 1986 to 2 June 2004.  The law requires a member to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 at the time he/she requests the transfer.  The applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 2 June 2004, some 5 years before the law became effective. 

2.  He was neither on active duty nor in the Selected Reserve at the time this program was implemented.  Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members.

3.  The requirements of this program are set in the law and any changes to this law are not within the purview of this Board.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in his case and as such, he is not entitled to the requested relief.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ___x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005887





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005887



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015351

    Original file (20140015351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The program to transfer education benefits to family members under TEB did not exist when he was released from active duty in 2004. The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019878

    Original file (20110019878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve so he can transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The official stated the applicant's last day of service with the ARNG was 31 August 2010 but he did not transfer his benefit prior to this date. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009565

    Original file (20120009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 23 years of service upon his separation from the ARNG; furthermore, he was not eligible to transfer benefits to dependent because the law requires Soldiers to be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. a. If the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve or on active duty on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he was not on active duty and left the ARNG prior to 1 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009634

    Original file (20120009634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was never informed of Post-9/11 GI Bill or the requirement to be on active duty to transfer this benefit * he believes he should have been informed of his eligibility during his outprocessing briefing * he was not required to serve any additional service and had met the requirements; he retired on 30 November 2009 3. The advisory official recommended approval and stated the applicant gained eligibility for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit before he left the service;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010131

    Original file (20140010131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve. On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no evidence he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006483

    Original file (20120006483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006483 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007756

    Original file (20120007756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve so he can transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer education benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. However, as the applicant had been in the Selected Reserve (in the ARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009401

    Original file (20120009401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, at the time of retirement, he was not informed his GI Bill educational benefits were non-transferable after retirement from the Army National Guard (ARNG). This law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The ARNG, DoD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017834

    Original file (20120017834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving as a member of the ARNG on active duty until he was released from active duty on 1 December 2009.