Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005782
Original file (20140005782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  15 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005782 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her records to show an additional 3 months of constructive service credit.

2.  The applicant states that during the recruiting process she was informed that she would be awarded constructive service credit equal to one-half the time she served as a civilian nurse and she worked approximately 10 months as a civilian nurse.  However, she was only granted 2 months and 16 days of constructive service credit, 3 months short of what was promised.  She also states that while it is only a short amount of time, it has affected her promotions to date and may affect them in the future.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her leave and earnings statement, Internal Revenue Service W-2 Form, and Officer Record Brief.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was commissioned as a Regular Army second lieutenant in the Army Nurse Corps on 1 February 2010 and was granted 2 months and 16 days of constructive service credit for civilian experience.

2.  She completed her officer basic course at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, and was transferred to Korea for her first assignment.  She was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 16 May 2011, completed her overseas tour in Korea, and was transferred to Hawaii.  She was promoted to the rank of captain on 1 November 2013.

3.  A staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Active Duty Nurse Program Manager of the U.S. Army Recruiting Command in the processing of this case. The advisory opinion stated the applicant's constructive service credit was calculated from the time her experience began (based on a résumé submitted by her at the time showing she began her professional nursing experience on 21 April 2009) until the time the selection board met (on 2 September 2009).  The Army Medical Department Board granted her 2 months and 16 days of constructive credit based on the information provided by the applicant.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to adjust her date of rank.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and to date no response has been received by the staff of the Board.

4.  A review of the documents provided by the applicant failed to show evidence that her civilian experience was greater than she was credited with.

5.  Department of Defense Instruction 6000.13 (Medical Manpower and Personnel), dated 30 June 1997, provides that a prospective health professions officer's entry grade and rank shall be determined by the number of years of entry-grade credit awarded on original appointment, designation, or assignment as a health professions officer.  Service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, but not in the corps or professional specialty in which being appointed, shall be awarded 1/2 day of credit for each day served in the case of individuals seeking an original appointment as a health professions officer.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted and appear to lack merit.  The applicant's constructive service credit was based on the information provided by the applicant at the time in the form of a résumé and her constructive service granted was granted based on that information.

2.  In the absence of substantiating evidence to show the applicant's civilian experience was different than what she originally provided, there appears to be no basis to grant her additional constructive credit.  To do so would afford her a benefit that others in similar circumstances are not afforded.

3.  It is noted that when similar cases have been presented to the Board in the past, the U.S. Army Recruiting Command Program Manager has been very forthcoming in admitting when mistakes were made in such computations and made favorable recommendations to grant the applicants additional service credit.  It is also noted that the U.S. Army Recruiting Command has previously stated that constructive service credit time is routinely calculated until the selection board meets.  Therefore, it does not appear that the applicant has been treated inequitably.

4.  Further, the program manager reviewed the applicant's service and determined that no mistakes were made in the computation of her service at the time the computation was made.  While the applicant may not agree with the outcome, there is insufficient evidence to show the computation is incorrect or any reason why she would not be given additional credit if so entitled.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X________________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005782



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021744

    Original file (20100021744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The applicant stated she had 2 years of ICU RN experience; however, she could not receive work experience credit after being boarded on 10 February 2009, the date of the board, regardless of how long it took her to enter active duty per Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department Branches). (2) Paragraph 6.1.2.2.5. states that credit of one-half year for each year of experience, up to a maximum of three years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011125

    Original file (20110011125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the original deliberations in this case the evidence of record and advisory opinion from the Active Duty Nurse Program Manager, USAREC, confirmed the applicant realized the benefit of constructive service credit for her qualifying (masters) degree by being granted 2 years of service in an active status when she was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer in the rank/grade of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 and, based upon receiving said credit, she was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014258

    Original file (20080014258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014258 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. At this time she appears to have been given credit for her prior service but no constructive credit for her civilian experience as a practicing nurse. Credit of one-half year for each year of experience, up to a maximum of three years of constructive credit, may be granted for experience in a health profession, if such experience is directly used by the Military Service concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014200C070206

    Original file (20050014200C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Army Nurse Program Manager noted that, according to Army Regulation 135- 101, chapter 3 and table 3-1, up to 3 years constructive credit was granted at the rate of one-half year per each year of professional experience. The applicant responded by maintaining that the applicable DODI Department of Defense Instruction and 10 USC provisions require that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017390

    Original file (20110017390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show adjustment in rank or date of rank (DOR) based on being granted constructive credit upon reentering the U.S. Army. Orders Number 294-002, issued by USA HRC, Fort Knox, KY, dated 21 October 2011, announced the applicant's promotion status and shows she was appointed in the rank of MAJ with an active DOR (ADOR) of 30 January 2008. Based on her prior active service and TIG in the rank of MAJ (i.e., 2 years and 2 months), the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014975

    Original file (20120014975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * her original DOR to the rank of captain (CPT) was 1 May 2005 * she was selected for the Funded Nurse Education Program (FNEP) and began the program on 10 December 2007 * as a condition of the program, she transferred branches to the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) after she received her nursing degree on 30 August 2009 * her DOR was then recalculated * before her DOR was adjusted, she was selected for promotion to the rank of major (MAJ) * after the U.S. Army Human Resources...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013664

    Original file (20100013664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit - Health Services Officers) shows in: a. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Active Duty Nurse Program Manager, Health Services Directorate, U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC), Fort Knox, KY. On 30 April 2010, this USAREC official provided the results of her review of the documents furnished by the applicant in support of her application to correct the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020467

    Original file (20100020467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit) shows she was granted 5 months and 12 days of CSC for professional experience from 30 July 2008 (date of licensure) to 23 June 2009 (date of board). The opinion states the applicant was board selected for the Regular Army Nurse Corps on 23 June 2009 in the rank of 2LT with 5 months and 12 days of CSC for work experience. The opinion concluded that per regulation, constructive credit calculation ceases at the date of the board and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015103

    Original file (20060015103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (As a result, the Regional Personnel Actions Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, indicated that it had administratively corrected the applicant's records to show 3 years of constructive service credit; however, in doing so, actually only credited the applicant with 2 years and 364 days of constructive credit (i.e., 14 January 1981), not 3 years of constructive credit (i.e., 13 January 1981).) On 22 January 2004, the USAR ANC PM provided an advisory opinion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016667

    Original file (20100016667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his constructive service credit be adjusted to grant him additional constructive service credit for his appointment in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC). Additionally, if those dates are used he can receive constructive credit for his professional experience as well and would add an additional 1 year and 1 month service credit. Accordingly, he was afforded more constructive service credit using his years of commissioned service than using active duty...