Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005587
Original file (20140005587.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  25 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005587 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show:

* he declined Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage for his spouse
* his retired rank is chief warrant officer four (CW4) to enable retired pay in that rank

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* SBP premiums are being deducted from his pay because he forgot to check the box declining the coverage after his wife's death
* Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) is paying him as a retired chief warrant officer three (CW3) despite his promotion to CW4

3.  The applicant provides:

* wife's death certificate
* U.S. Total Army Personnel Command memorandum, dated 18 July 2000, promoting him to CW4

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant joined the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 5 February 1981 as a warrant officer with prior Reserve Component service and active Federal service.  He was issued his 20-year letter on 9 November 1999.

2.  The applicant signed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) on 8 January 2000 at the age of 47, electing full spouse and children coverage, Option C, for immediate coverage.  At the time of his election the applicant was married.  His daughter was 23 years old and his son was 14 years old.

3.  The applicant provided a copy of a State of Illinois Medical Examiner's – Coroner's Certificate of Death showing his wife's date of death was 19 March 2001.

4.  He was separated from the Illinois ARNG on 2 May 2001 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  (Once a Soldier is transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), he becomes a member of the USAR in an active status.)

5.  After separation from the ARNG, he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned warrant officer to the rank of CW4 with an effective date of 18 July 2002 per U.S. Total Army Personnel Command memorandum, dated 18 July 2002.

6.  The applicant was released from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 27 December 2006 and transferred to the USAR Standby Reserve (Inactive Status List).  Reassignment Orders C-12-643012 issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command reflect his rank as CW4.

7.  He was released from the USAR Standby Reserve (Inactive Status List) on 14 January 2008 and assigned to the Retired Reserve.  Reassignment Orders 
C-01-800744 issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command reflect his rank as CW4.

8.  The applicant was placed on the Retired List on 21 June 2013 in accordance with U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders C02-491462, dated 25 February 2014.  The orders reflect the applicant's retired rank as CW3.

9.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-11, prescribes policies and procedures for computation of retired pay for Army National Guard and Army Reservist Soldiers.  It states that if the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 24 February 1975, retired grade will be that grade which a commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months.  A warrant officer must have served on active duty or in an active reserve status for at least 31 days.

10.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

11.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation, (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday, and (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member's retired pay (costs for option C being the more expensive).  Once a member elects either option B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP – it automatically converts to SBP coverage.  If RCSBP option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection should the member die prior to age 60.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show his retired rank as CW4 to enable him to receive retired pay in this rank.

2.  A warrant officer transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 24 February 1975 will hold the grade/rank which the warrant officer held while on active duty or in an active Reserve status for at least 31 days.

3.  The available evidence shows he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned warrant officer to the rank of CW4 with an effective date of 18 July 2002 while he was in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  The applicant was released from the USAR on 26 December 2006.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his rank to CW4.

4.  The applicant also contends his military records should be corrected to show he declined SBP coverage for his spouse after her death because he forgot to do so at the time.

5.  The available evidence shows the applicant made a valid election after he received his 20-year letter to provide full coverage, option C, for his wife and dependent children.  His wife died about 14 months later.

6.  Once a member elects option C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option C RCSBP participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60 and cannot cancel SBP participation or change the option they had in RCSBP.  Any RCSBP deduction currently being taken from the applicant's retired pay would be a premium related to the child coverage enjoyed by his minor son from age 15 until he reached age 18 or 22, if attending school.

7.  The applicant's spousal coverage should have gone into a suspended status upon his wife's death.  Assuming he did not remarry, there should be no RCSBP/SBP spousal premiums being taken from his retired pay, provided he informed DFAS of his wife's death.  The applicant may provide additional information on this point if he still believes an error exists.

8.  In view of the above, the applicant's request for records correction to reflect declination of SBP should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by reflecting the applicant's retired rank as CW4 and paying him all due back retired pay.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so 


much of the application that pertains to amendment of the applicant's records to show declination of RCSBP coverage for his spouse.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005587



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005587



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023565

    Original file (20110023565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Upon his divorce in 2001, he notified officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) that he was divorced and did not want to participate in the SBP * When he applied for retired pay in January 2011, he and his new spouse elected not to participate in the SBP * When he received his first Retiree Account Statement, he noticed that he was enrolled in the SBP and his first wife was listed as the beneficiary * DFAS corrected the next pay statement by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012542

    Original file (20080012542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the deductions being made from his Retired Pay for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums be stopped. The applicant was placed on the retired list on 25 May 2008 (at age 60) and premiums are now being deducted from his retired pay for both RCSBP and SBP. Therefore, since he has failed to show that he was misinformed of his options under the SBP and since he has the option of terminating his SBP participation beginning on the second anniversary of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008620

    Original file (20090008620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The FSM's records indicate that he had no eligible dependents at the time he made his election and declined to participate in the RCSBP 3. Although the FSM had two opportunities during which to enroll the applicant in the RCSBP, his record is devoid of any evidence and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence that the FSM attempted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015648C070206

    Original file (20050015648C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM married the applicant on 10 March 1988. Once a member elects either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the 7 February 1985 DD Form 1883; b. showing the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP on 11 February 1984 for spouse and children coverage by completing a DD Form 1883 and the DD Form 1883 was accepted and processed by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012273

    Original file (20090012273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 10 December 2001, as he neared his 60th birthday, the applicant submitted a request for retired pay and although not required, he also completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay) in conjunction with this application and again elected spouse coverage based on the full amount. This deduction is the cost of the SBP coverage or protection the applicant's spouse enjoyed from the date the applicant made an election. The applicant appears to believe that he is locked...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009043

    Original file (20140009043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He completed prior service in the Regular Army and married L____ on 27 March 1987. The applicant provided a Complaint for Absolute Divorce that was filed on 15 July 2003; however, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he was granted a final divorce by the court.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064595C070421

    Original file (2001064595C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of the former service member (FSM), requests that her late husband’s records be corrected to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve prior to his death on 4 April 1999. It would appear that she wants her late husband’s records corrected to show that he made application for retired pay at age 60, that he elected SBP, and that his application for retired pay and application for SBP were accepted prior to his death. It is evident that the FSM requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029334

    Original file (20100029334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he and his spouse elected not to participate in RCSBP. This memorandum notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001121

    Original file (20120001121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 April 2010, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant's former spouse that her application for payment of a portion of the applicant's retired pay under the Uniformed Services Former Spouse's Protection Act was received but could not be approved because the court order she provided did not provide sufficient information to calculate the amount of retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011026

    Original file (20130011026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He is now requesting that the election be granted for his spouse "Karen" to receive the RCSBP upon his death. The applicant's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing he never made an RCSBP election * showing he submitted an SBP election for spouse coverage only based on the full amount upon...