Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004654
Original file (20140004654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  21 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004654 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).  He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-36-XXXX vice XXX-39-XXXX.

2.  He states he received this award after he was discharged from the military, and his SSN is incorrect.

3.  He provides:

* his DD Form 214
* a DA Form 4980-14 (ARCOM Certificate)
* his social security card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States on 25 June 1968 and served until he was discharged on 2 June 1969 in order to accept a commission.  The DD Form 214 he was issued, dated 2 June 1969, does not show award of the ARCOM.  Item 3 (Social Security Number) of this DD Form 214 shows his SSN as XXX-36-XXXX.

3.  He was appointed as an officer in the U.S. Army Reserve and ordered to active duty on 3 June 1969.

4.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) does not show award of the ARCOM.

5.  His record contains the following documents which show his SSN as XXX-36-XXXX:

* Special Orders Number 125, dated 25 June 1968
* a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 3 June 1969
* DA Form 1059 (Academic Report), dated 20 January 1970
* Special Orders Number 148, dated 16 July 1973

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 4 September 1973.  His DD Form 214, for the period ending 4 September 1973, does not show award of the ARCOM.  Item 3 of this DD Form 214 shows his SSN as XXX-39-XXXX.

7.  He submitted:

	a.  a DA Form 4980-14, dated 12 September 1973, which shows he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period August 1971 to September 1973.

	b.  his social security card that lists his SSN as XXX-36-XXXX.

8.  His record is void of orders or any corroborating documents awarding him the ARCOM.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Documents in his personnel record correctly list his SSN as XXX-36-XXXX; however, it appears his SSN was incorrectly transcribed to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 September 1973.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the SSN as shown on his social security card. 

2.  There are no orders or other corroborating evidence in the applicant's record, and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence, that confirms he was awarded the  ARCOM.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting this portion of his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

____X____  ____X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 
deleting from item 3 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 September 1973 the current entry and replacing it with the SSN as shown on his social security card.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 








denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON


I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004654





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004654



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002900

    Original file (20130002900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed the following two award orders issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division (Vietnam) that show his SSN as xxx-xx-xxx0: * General Orders Number 9402, dated 26 August 1969, that awarded him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service from September 1968 to September 1969 * General Orders Number 14190, dated 3 November 1969, that awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism on 10 August 1969 4. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003700

    Original file (20130003700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Aside from on documents he provides and the ARCOM orders previously discussed, the contested SSN ("XXX-XX-4199") does not appear in his available records. His records are void of orders that show he was awarded a second award of the ARCOM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to conclude his ARCOM orders and certificate were completed in error and should be corrected to show his proper and correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009287

    Original file (20140009287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 February 1969 shows his SSN as XXX-76-XXXX. He provided a BSM Citation which shows he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 1 April 1970 to 31 December 1970. It appears he provided a BSM Certificate, dated 3 January 1970, which shows he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement during the period 1 April 1970 to 31 December 1970, with his discharge upgrade request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006206

    Original file (20110006206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). All of his other military documents contain his correct SSN. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110006206 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110006206 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001800

    Original file (20150001800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The following documents contained in his available military personnel records, show his SSN consistently appears as XXX-XX-X010: * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * General Orders Number 5714, dated 7 November 1969 * DD Form 1407...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014683

    Original file (20140014683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 2 June 1969, to show his social security number (SSN) as "XXX-X8-XXXX" instead of "XXX-X9-XXXX." It states the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010426

    Original file (20120010426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his social security number (SSN) as "XXX-52-XXXX" instead of "XXX-54-XXXX" and issuance of a corrected DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current SSN entries from the following documents as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018973

    Original file (20130018973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. When the applicant entered active duty, Soldiers were identified by an ASN. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), effective 1 February 1967, stated the SSN in item 3 of the DD Form 214 would be transcribed from the Soldier's DA Form 2139.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001394

    Original file (20130001394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States) lists his assigned service number; it does not list his SSN. Therefore, based on the evidence of record and the evidence provided by the applicant, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Forms 214 for the periods of service ending 4 April 1968 and 24 January 1973 to show the SSN as it is listed on his Social Security Card. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004112

    Original file (20110004112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his social security number (SSN) as "XXX-58-XXXX." His second DD Form 214 shows his SSN as "XXX-58-XXXX" which is not recorded anywhere else in his records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant's SSN as "XXX-58-XXXX" on his DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 26 June 1968 and 28 August 1971.