Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004619
Original file (20140004619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004619 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his grade/rank as corporal (CPL)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was transferred between Germany and Washington, DC at the time of his separation, due to a service-connected disability
* he assumed the rank/grade listed on his DD Form 214 was in error and the Army would fix it
* he was informed he would be separated in the rank/grade of CPL/E-4 and this did not happen

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 July 1988 in the rank/grade of private (PVT)/E-1.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police).

3.  On 5 December 1988, while assigned to Fort McClellan, AL, he twisted his right ankle by stepping on a rock while running during a diagnostic physical fitness test.

4.  On 28 December 1988, he was assigned to the 61st Military Police Company, Hanau, Germany.

5.  On 26 January 1989, he was advanced to the rank/grade of PVT/E-2.

6.  On 1 March 1989, he was advanced to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.

7.  On 21 February 1990, he was reassigned to the Medical Hold Company, Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC), Washington, DC. 

8.  A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 1 September 1990, shows he was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 on the same date, and his advancement was approved by the Commanding Officer, WRAMC.

9.  A DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 4 September 1990, shows he was undergoing a medical review board.  This form shows his rank as PFC.

10.  His DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings), dated 7 September 1990, shows his highest rank as PFC.  

11.  On 31 October 1990, he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Transition Point, WRAMC, Washington, DC, in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3.

12.  On 31 October 1990, he was retired due to a temporary physical disability.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – Private First Class
* item 4b (Pay Grade) – E3

13.  On 1 November 1990, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 with a 30-percent disability rating.

14.  A TDRL DA Form 199, dated 27 March 1992, shows his rank as CPL.

15.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, stated advancements to E-4 and below and grade restorations would be announced by DA Form 4187.  The date of advancement would not be earlier than the date of the commander's signature and the date of rank and effective date would be the same date.

16.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contained guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that items 4a and 4b would show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and the information would be obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although he contends he was advanced to the rank/grade of CPL/E-4 and notwithstanding the entry on his DA Form 199, dated 27 March 1992, the evidence of record shows he was advanced to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 September 1990.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as SPC/E-4.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__X______  __X______  __X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his rank/grade as SPC/E-4 on his DD Form 214.



2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as CPL/E-4.



      ____________X________________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004619



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004619



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017949

    Original file (20140017949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 24 May 1991, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – his rank as corporal (CPL) instead of specialist (SPC) * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – his secondary (S) military occupational specialty (MOS) of 95B (Military Police (MP)) 2. Therefore, the evidence of record is sufficient to warrant correction of item 4a of his 1991 DD Form 214 to show his rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007368

    Original file (20090007368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His records show he was advanced to pay PFC, pay grade E-3, on 1 April 2005. The evidence shows he was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade of PFC, E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022224

    Original file (20110022224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her correct rank. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued at the time shows in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "PFC" * Item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E03" * Item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "2009 06 11" (11 June 2009) 4. While undergoing physical disability processing, she met the requirements for promotion to SPC on 11 June 2011 and a DA Form 4187...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059936C070421

    Original file (2001059936C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019293

    Original file (20120019293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 * his last duty assignment and major command as the 411th Medical Company * the station where he separated as Savannah, GA * his character of service as honorable 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty for training on 26 May 1989 by reason of completion of required active service with uncharacterized service. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013730

    Original file (20110013730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 and to show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Hand Grenade Bars. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, stated a Soldier could be advanced to SPC/E-4 with 26 months' time in service (TIS) and 6 months' time in grade (TIG). Therefore, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076495C070215

    Original file (2002076495C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This law applies both at the time a member is placed on the TDRL or the Retired List based on a permanent disability. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 October 1985, and that he held that rank and pay grade on the date of his REFRAD on 30 April 1986. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...