Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004154
Original file (20140004154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  9 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004154 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show his last name as “Bxxxt.”

2.  The applicant states that he served under the last name of “Rxxxn” but later found out that his real last name is “Bxxxt.” 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), Social Security Card, and driver’s license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records were not available for review by the Board.  However, the documents provided by the applicant are sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of his case.

3.  The applicant was serving in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) under the last name of “Rxxxn” when he was ordered to initial active duty training on 15 February 1974.

4.  On 31 March 1974, he was honorably released from active duty training under the trainee discharge program and was returned to his CAARNG unit.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his release was prepared to reflect the last name of “Rxxxn.”  He had served 1 month and 16 days of active service.

5.  All of the documents provided by the applicant reflect a last name of “Bxxxt.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time served as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information that is current as of the effective date of separation.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted and served all of his service under the last name of “Rxxxn.”

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now change his last name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.

3.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application will be filed in his official military personnel file (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the last name recorded in his military record and to satisfy his desire to have his correct last name documented in his OMPF.  Accordingly, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004154





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004154



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005477

    Original file (20090005477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the name recorded in his military records exhibits a material error or injustice. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted, served, and was REFRAD under the name of "H--- N----- D---" and it was not until after his REFRAD that he had his name legally changed. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his legal name as it existed on the date of his REFRAD and there is no basis to change his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020438

    Original file (20130020438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020804

    Original file (20100020804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted, served, and was honorably released from active duty under the middle and last name of O---z M----y. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms his correct last name, will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021157

    Original file (20130021157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documents contained in his DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ)), initiated and completed during his Regular Army period of service covered by his DD Form 214, consistently show his name as "Gxxxx, Robert Gxxx." The evidence of record shows that upon his enlistment into the Army, he listed his name as "Gxxxx, Robert Gxxx." The evidence of record further shows he used that name throughout his period of service in the Regular Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007936

    Original file (20110007936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he served under the last name of “Mi--ie--cz”; however, in 1974 he had his last name changed to “McKay” and he desires to have his DD Form 214 corrected to prove his service and for his family records. He had served 6 months of ACDUTRA and his DD Form 214 reflects his last name as “Mi--ie--cz”. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009891

    Original file (20110009891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to reflect his legal name change of 28 February 2011. The applicant states on 28 February 2011 he legally changed his name from "Thomas A---n W--------k" to "Thomas W----r A---n." 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000031

    Original file (20150000031.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This DA Form 1506 does not show she entered active duty on 8 July 2012. c. The DA Form 1506 she digitally signed on 26 September 2014, which was also authenticated by an HR Technician on 26 September 2014 documents her various periods of service and differentiates each period as Army service in either the ARNG, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) or Regular components. Her OMPF contains 2 DA Forms 1506 that were completed in 2013 and 2014. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025818

    Original file (20100025818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the name that is recorded in his military records. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, the document provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in his official military service records, including his DD Form 214. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002535

    Original file (20140002535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 August 1976 to show: * his status as a Vietnam era veteran vice post-Vietnam veteran * the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. Therefore, there is no basis for entering any marksmanship qualification badges on the DD Form 214 documenting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002535

    Original file (20140002535 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 August 1976 to show: * his status as a Vietnam era veteran vice post-Vietnam veteran * the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. Therefore, there is no basis for entering any marksmanship qualification badges on the DD Form 214 documenting...