IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 October 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140003702
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his uncharacterized discharge be changed to an honorable discharge by reason of permanent disability.
2. The applicant states that he entered the Army with all good intentions and respect and did not realize that a prior injury would be aggravated by the service. He was unable to serve due to a condition he had that he was aware of but did not realize it would prevent him from fulfilling his obligation.
3. The applicant provides copies of his Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) proceedings and his separation proceedings.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army at 30+ years of age on 25 August 1998 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman. At the time of his entrance processing he indicated that he was in good health and he made no mention of any prior injuries. He was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia to undergo his one-station unit training.
3. On 8 September 1998, during the applicants second week of training, an EPSBD was convened which determined that the applicant had a herniated disc that existed prior to his service (EPTS). The board determined that his condition did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment and that his condition was not aggravated by his service. The board recommended that he be separated from the service.
4. On 22 September 1998, the applicant made a sworn statement in which he stated that a year and a half earlier he had been in an automobile accident in which he was rear-ended and suffered lower back injuries which included two herniated discs. He also stated that he did not realize that his physical condition would prevent him from completing the physical part of his training.
5. On 28 September 1998, the applicants commander advised him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 7, for erroneous entry due to his failure to notify officials that he had been previously treated for his back condition at the time of enlistment.
6. The applicant waived all of his rights and elected not to make a statement in his own behalf.
7. On 13 October 1998, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge.
8. Accordingly, he was discharged on 28 October 1998 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 7, due to erroneous entry. He had served 1 month and 24 days of active service and his service was uncharacterized.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry level status.
10. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 7-15, of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that an erroneous exists when it is discovered that a Soldier failed to meet the qualifications for enlistment. Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge, or a general discharge, or a discharge under other than honorable conditions. If in an entry level status the characterization will be uncharacterized.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that his uncharacterized discharge should be changed to a discharge by reason of permanent disability has been noted and appears to lack merit.
2. The applicant concealed his prior back injury at the time he enlisted and in all likelihood would have been rejected for enlistment had it been known at the time.
3. Therefore, the evidence of record shows he was properly discharged for erroneous entry in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicants rights.
4. The applicant entered the Army with a condition that was EPTS and in which he concealed or failed to make known to enlisting officials.
5. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicants request for an upgrade of his discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140003702
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140003702
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019011
The applicant requests, in effect, change of the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 5 November 2008 to show he was hurt on active duty and that his injury is service-connected. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022568
On 11 June 2010, he received counseling for his event-oriented injury and his separation from the Army due to a physical injury in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-11 (EPTS). A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085557C070212
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 provides that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017740
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017740 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The EPSBD recommended that the applicant be separated from the military due to his diagnosed medical condition. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007707
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002926
His service medical records are not available for review. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was discharged for physical disability. He concurred with the EPSBD proceedings and requested discharge without delay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009926C070206
The applicant's records contain a copy of a SF Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 9 May 1991, that was prepared prior to his entrance on active duty (AD) in the Army National Guard (ARNG), which shows that he was medically qualified for enlistment with a 111111 physical profile. The evidence of record shows that the applicant sustained an injury to his left knee, at the age of 15, prior to his entry on AD, EPTS. His DD Form 3647 indicated that he was found unfit for enlistment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705840
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DISCUSSION : Considering...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705840C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 11September 1996 the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064083C070421
On 3 March 1998, the appropriate separation authority approved his discharge and indicated that the authority for his discharge would be Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 (Entry Level Separation) with a characterization of service of “uncharacterized.” On 10 March 1998, he was discharged with a characterization of service of uncharacterized under the above-cited regulation. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed Military Police training and was awarded MOS 95B and his...