Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003026
Original file (20140003026 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  18 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003026 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests he be awarded the Valorous Unit Award (VUA).

2.  The applicant states he served with the 19th Engineer Battalion during a period the unit was awarded the VUA but it was never given to him.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his record of assignments from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and a page from the history of the 19th Engineer Battalion (Internet article).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 November 1965 for a period of 3 years and training as an engineer construction equipment operator.  He completed basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and advanced individual training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri before being transferred to Fort Hood, Texas for assignment to the 589th Engineer Battalion.  

3.  On 11 April 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and on 6 July 1967, he was transferred to the 19th Engineer Battalion.  He was promoted to pay grade E-5 on 4 January 1968 and departed Vietnam on 6 April 1968 for assignment to Fort Hood.

4.  On 4 November 1968, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and National Defense Service Medal.

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  A review of this pamphlet failed to show the 19th Engineer Battalion was awarded the VUA during the period the applicant served with the unit.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s supporting documents and contention that he should be awarded the VUA for his service with the 19th Engineer Battalion in Vietnam has been noted. 

2.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam and it does not indicate that his unit received the VUA during the period he served with that unit.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of official credible evidence showing otherwise, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003026



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003026



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009509

    Original file (20110009509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214), dated 13 December 2006. The evidence of record confirms the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was added to the applicant's DD Form 214 when a DD Form 215 was issued on 13 December 2006. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005776

    Original file (20130005776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 10 December 1993, amended his DD Form 214 by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and adding the: * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Good Conduct Medal * Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023208

    Original file (20100023208.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA). For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011306C080213

    Original file (20070011306C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add the Valorous Unit Award (VUA). It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011312

    Original file (20060011312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011312 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), and the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp. There is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021083

    Original file (20100021083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show the Valorous Unit Award (VUA). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 12 July 1967 through 11 July 1969, b. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019135

    Original file (20100019135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020555

    Original file (20110020555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. all of his awards, to include his Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device; b. all unit awards he may be authorized, to include the Valorous Unit Award (VUA); c. his correct primary specialty as 1331 (Combat Engineer); and d. his demolition and mine warfare training. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023505

    Original file (20100023505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, his unit in Vietnam was awarded the VUA on 9 September 2009 in Permanent Orders 252-09 and he desires that it be added to his records. On 2 May 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the VSM from block 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003662C070206

    Original file (20050003662C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device and that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 4 October 1966 through 3 October 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...