IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 September 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002945
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states while in action against hostile Chinese in North Korea he was blown up by a short round from friendly fire in June 1951.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
3. His DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 October 1950. He served in Korea and he was honorably released from active duty on 24 July 1952.
4. His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) of his
DD Form 214 shows the entry "None."
5. There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.
6. His name does not appear on the Korean casualty roster.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Purple Heart to individuals wounded or killed as a result of friendly fire in the heat of battle as long as the friendly projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends he was wounded by friendly fire in Korea in June 1951.
2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for award of the Purple Heart and all other awards. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify:
* that the wound was the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by military medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records
3. The governing regulation also provides for award of the Purple Heart to individuals wounded or killed as a result of friendly fire in the heat of battle as long as the friendly projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.
4. There is no evidence of record that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Korea. There is also no evidence of record that shows he was wounded as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" by a "friendly" projectile/agent released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment. Regrettably, therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002945
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002945
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019458
The applicant states he should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received from friendly fire while on a combat mission. The applicant stated and the evidence of record supports that he received shrapnel wounds to his right shoulder and right leg while serving in Korea in April 1967 when another member of his unit discharged his weapon upon returning from a combat patrol. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009015
That decision denied award of the Purple Heart because there was insufficient evidence of record to show the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Cambodia in June 1970. The applicant provided clinical record sheets and treatment records showing that he received a shrapnel wound to the left forearm as a result of friendly fire on 19 June 1970. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003488
The applicants records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 5 December 1967 to on or about 26 November 1968. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment or that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019543
The applicant states award of the Purple Heart for friendly fire was not authorized until 1 March 2012. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, there is no evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" and treated for those wounds. The newspaper article he provided shows an incident occurred, apparently in November 1966, when disgruntled allied forces assaulted a building in Vietnam and wounded two Americans.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008167
However, the transcript of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) held on 13 March 1952 shows the record was corrected to show "Line of Duty - Yes" based on a report dated 12 March 1951. They have filed an appeal with the Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery, based on errors in the FSM's record, but they would like to have the FSM's records corrected to show he was entitled to the Purple Heart. His record is void of documentation showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010562
There are no general orders in the applicant's records to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There are no available medical records showing he was wounded or injured as a result of friendly fire or treated for such wounds. As a result, the Board commends that all Department of the Army Records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for a wound received on 28 April 2004.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023010
He provides eyewitness statements from fellow Soldiers attesting the applicant ignored his own two wounds to treat wounded Soldiers on 30 June 1970. There is no evidence of record which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, in the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was wounded as a result of friendly fire in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for awarding the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007137
The applicant, the wife of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to add the Purple Heart. The FSM was accidentally injured in the line of duty in Germany, on 9 April 1945, when a fellow Soldier was hit by enemy fire and dropped the tail gate of an antitank gun on the FSM's foot. His WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the Purple Heart or indicate that he received any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010580
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100022457 on 8 March 2011. Additionally, his records do not contain official orders awarding him the Purple Heart. While the applicant's medical records clearly show he was medically evacuated, admitted to various hospitals, and underwent treatment for perforated ears, there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017773
Personnel wounded as a result of non-hostile action who are not placed on hospital's very seriously injured lists are not reported as casualties in accordance with current regulations. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. There is no available evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence...