IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 September 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002313
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to honorable due to death in the family.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was not able to take care of his ill father who later expired.
3. The applicant provides a DD Form 794A (Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate) and an obituary.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 1979.
3. His record contains three DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action), which show his duty status changed on:
* 1 February 1984, from present for duty (PDY) to absent without leave (AWOL)
* 2 March 1984, from AWOL to dropped from the rolls (DFR)
* 9 March 1984, from DFR to attached/PDY
4. The specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing are not available for review. However, the available evidence includes a
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that contains the authority and reason for his discharge. It shows he was discharged on 26 April 1984 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he completed a total of 4 years, 3 months, and 29 days of active service with 36 days of time lost.
5. He submitted an obituary, which shows that his father died on 14 May 1987.
6. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, the type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans Administration benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions would normally be given to an individual who was discharged for the good of the Service.
b. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
c. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge. It appears that he was charged with the commission of offense(s) punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with a punitive discharge. Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant is presumed to have voluntarily, willingly, and in writing, requested discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he would have admitted guilt and waived his opportunity to appear before a court-martial. It is also presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Furthermore, in the absence of evidence showing otherwise, it must be presumed his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
3. His record shows he had 36 days time lost . As a result, his record of service was not satisfactory and he did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.
4. There is no evidence nor did he submit sufficient evidence that shows he informed anyone in his chain of command that his father, who expired 3 years after he was discharged, was ill.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's an honorable or a general discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X__________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002313
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002313
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002796
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019585
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 2 July 1970, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate and reduction to private/E-1. On 24 November 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board, after careful consideration of his military records and all other...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015711C070206
The applicant's military service records contain a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record). There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. However, the applicant provided no evidence, and there is no evidence in the available records, that supports the applicant’s contention that his overall record of service was not given due consideration at the time he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023467
The applicant requests, in effect, the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected by upgrading his undesirable discharge (UD) to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the FSM's records that shows he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any evidence to show the FSM was not properly and equably...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001169
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of the Record of Proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) from his military records. On 4 December 2014 after carefully considering the evidence of record and the evidence presented by the applicant, the ABCMR denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015949
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 January 1992 to show in: * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar * item 14 (Military Education), in effect: * Advanced Food Service Specialist, 2 weeks, 1983 * Jungle Operations Training...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013202
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. On 2 December 1981, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). The evidence of record also shows that the applicant failed to complete the training he requested when he enlisted in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000903
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 23 April 1980, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to PV1/E-1. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 21 May 1980 in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016514
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his date of discharge as 10 June 1990 instead of 5 October 1989. The DD Form 214 that was issued at the time shows the applicant was discharged on 5 October 1989 in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial, with a character of service of under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001303
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001303 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 2 March 2007 in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and received a reentry (RE) code of 4 and a separation code of KFS. On 5 May 2010, the ADRB considered his...