Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002212
Original file (20140002212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  14 October 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002212 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, additional service credit by correcting his records to show the time he served as the recruitment coordinator for the Jerome High School in Idaho as time on active duty.

2.  The applicant states he wore his uniform for 8 hours a day and for 5 days a week.  He states the months that he wore his uniform were from August 1987 to May 1988.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) for 8 years on 29 September 1987.  He was ordered to active duty for training on 9 June 1988 and he completed training as a turret mechanic.

3.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form) which shows that on 7 October 1988, he was recommended for award of the Idaho Recruiting Ribbon.

4.  On 15 April 1989, the applicant was released from active duty for training and he returned to the IDARNG to complete his service obligation.  He received a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty) that shows his active duty service.

5.  The applicant was discharged from the IDARNG under honorable conditions on 2 May 1991.  His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he completed 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days of net service this period.

6.  A review of the available record fails to show that the applicant had any military service prior to his enlistment in the IDARNG on 29 September 1987.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends that he had active service and wore his uniform as a recruiter at his high school in August 1987.  The applicant did not enlist in the IDARNG until 29 September 1987 and a review of his record fails to show that he had any military service prior to his enlistment in the IDARNG.

2.  The available record does show that on 7 October 1988 he was recommended for award of the Idaho Recruiting Ribbon.  That was during his active duty service from 9 June 1988 to 15 April 1989.  The DD Form 214 he received covers his period of active duty service.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002212



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002212



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005312

    Original file (20140005312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 3 (social security number (SSN)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 3 July 1992. His military records contain the following: a. DD Form 1966/1 (Application for Enlistment – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 18 January 1983, which lists his SSN as "XXX-XX-X9XX." There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show the SSN listed on his 1992 DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007442

    Original file (20090007442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states, in effect, that her original Oath of Office and state appointment orders were voided and once the administrative error was corrected her appointment date was changed from 22 October 2008 to 26 February 2009 causing an adjustment to her date of rank, adjustment to her service creditable for retirement, and recoupment of the pay received for the period of 27 October 2008 to 25 February 2009. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from active duty on 26 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015129

    Original file (20140015129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he transferred his education benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to being retired from the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG). Any Service member on or after 1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her request for TEB under this section, may transfer that entitlement provided he or she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002085

    Original file (20130002085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation of the recoupment action that requires him to repay his $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) for Critical Skill military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and that he be allowed to retain the bonus as an exception to policy (ETP). He stated the applicant contracted for a $20,000 NPS Critical Skill Enlistment Bonus as a 68W on 4 August 2008. He stated the applicant contracted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006603

    Original file (20140006603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During 2001-2003, student loans were used for her MSW degree. The applicant responded to the advisory opinion stating: * she disagrees with the advisory opinion and requests her student loans be paid in full, per her HPLRP agreement, and her Special Pay bonus be paid based on the corrected date * she incurred a mortgage debt that is barely manageable with her monthly salary, given the student loan payments she is responsible for * she and her bank both relied on assurances from the ARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019797

    Original file (20140019797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (SLRP Addendum) * Memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for SLRP [Applicant], dated 8 August 2014 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He would receive a total bonus of $15,000, to be processed on the date his extension or reenlistment took effect. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016321C070206

    Original file (20050016321C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 12 September 2004 in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and, through no fault of his own and due to administrative error at the State Headquarters, the original documentation was not sent to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) for processing of his permanent Oath of Office for Federal Recognition. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 12 September 2004...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000243

    Original file (20120000243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was honorably discharged due to a personality disorder and he was issued an RE-3 code for a personality disorder. However, his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows that he was honorably discharged on 16 April 1993 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, due to a personality disorder. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002344

    Original file (20140002344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that on 23 January 2006 he signed a 6-year reenlistment contract and at the time he accepted an extension bonus of $15,000. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a written agreement for a $15,000 bonus at the time of extension in the IDARNG for a period of 6 years on 23 January 2006. The evidence clearly shows that he extended on 28 July 2006 and accepted an indefinite MilTech position on 6 August 2006, which converted to a permanent MilTech position on 6...