Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002149
Original file (20140002149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	 2 October 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002149 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He has been notified by the Department of Defense that he has not been released from the TDRL as yet, although no TDRL payments have been issued.

	b.  He was informed that he needed to contact the military records correction department to release his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 May 1992 and trained as an infantryman.  On 16 July 1993, he was retired by reason of temporary disability and placed on the TDRL the following day.  His DD Form 214 shows he retired on 16 July 1993.

3.  His records contain:

	a.  a letter from the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Physical Disability Branch, dated 6 March 1996, which states his eligibility to receive disability retirement pay was terminated effective 7 April 1996 because of his failure to report for his periodic medical examination; and

	b.  a memorandum from the U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, dated 7 July 1999, which states the applicant is no longer on TDRL and should be administratively removed.  The effective date of removal was 9 July 1999.

4.  U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Orders D239-23, dated 12 December 2000, administratively removed him from the TDRL without entitlement to severance pay because he failed to complete a scheduled physical reexamination as required by law.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would not be prepared for members being removed from the TDRL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant implies he has not been released from the TDRL, the evidence shows he was removed from the TDRL on 12 December 2000 because of his failure to report for his periodic medical examination.  These orders are his ultimate discharge from the Army.  A copy of these orders will be provided to the applicant.

2.  Since a DD Form 214 is not prepared for members being removed from the TDRL, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002149



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002149



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010618C070208

    Original file (20040010618C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Listed as evidence is a DVA examination dated 30 April 1997. On 24 August 2005, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records notified the DAV of the applicant's pending application and requested that they review his records within 30 days. On 1 May 1992, the applicant was released from active duty due to disability, temporary and placed on the TDRL with a disability rating of 30 percent on 2 May 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023001

    Original file (20100023001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his permanent physical disability be removed from his military records and that he be granted a 20-year retirement. (2) Paragraph 7-4 states that a Soldier will be removed from the TDRL and separated with severance pay if the Soldier has less than 20 years of service and is unfit because of the disability for which the Soldier was placed on the TDRL and either the disability has stabilized at less than 30 percent or the disability, although not stabilized, has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001168

    Original file (20070001168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was permanently retired. On 17 February 1994, the applicant was notified by mail that records show he failed to report for his periodic physical examination during September 1992. Evidence of record shows the applicant was counseled on 8 August 1991 and informed of the requirement for periodic medical examinations while on the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003348

    Original file (20140003348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Currently the VA rates his disability at 60% for the left leg, 20% for his right leg, and 50% for PTSD. The PEB rated his two unfitting conditions and recommended a 60% rating for the left leg (above-the-knee amputation) and 30% for the right leg (healing open fracture). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing he underwent a TDRL PEB in 1996 and his conditions of amputation of the leg and PTSD were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009537

    Original file (20090009537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). These orders also show the applicant had completed 16 years, 3 months, and 7 days of creditable service for disability retirement under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, and 18 years, 2 months, and 18 days of creditable service for basic pay. This document further shows the applicant placed his signature on the DA Form 199 on 21 March 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011459

    Original file (20120011459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 14 September 1996, the applicant was honorably retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), and placed on the TDRL. There is no evidence to show the applicant performed any period of active duty service following his placement the TDRL that would have warranted the issuance of a DD Form 214 subsequent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106200C070208

    Original file (2004106200C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, by regulation, the RE-4 code assigned the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of physical disability. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011357

    Original file (20060011357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he should have been medically retired at the time of his discharge. On 12 January 1995, the applicant withdrew his request for a formal PEB and concurred with the PEB's findings. Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013746

    Original file (20090013746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged for retirement, permanent disability. The evidence shows the applicant was retired from active duty for temporary disability, on 17 April 1996, issued a DD Form 214, and placed on the TDRL. _______ _ _X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008962

    Original file (20090008962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued on 2 June 2003 be changed to show that he was retired due to permanent physical disability and that item 18 (Remarks) of this document be corrected to show that he was awarded an 80-percent disability rating from the Army. He also states that the USAPDA told him that he had to make a request through the Army Board for...