Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002116
Original file (20140002116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  4 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002116 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her narrative reason for discharge and an upgrade of her uncharacterized service to honorable.

2.  The applicant states the entry level discharge that she received is usually given to Soldiers who served 180 days or less; however, she served for 182 days and she believes Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) supports her contention.  There were unforeseen circumstances while she was enlisted but she continues to serve her country and is proud to be an American.  She currently works for the Department of Homeland Security and feels she deserves to have her discharge changed as soon as possible.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record)
* DD Form 2586 (Verification of Military Experience and Training)
* DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard)
* Page 48 of Army Regulation 635-200 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 November 1990.

3.  The applicant received developmental counseling on:

* 5 February 1991, for failing to follow the standards and requirements set for Phase IV
* 19 February 1991, for failing to achieve 70 percent or higher on the End of Annex Test 
* 18 April 1991, for failing to follow instructions

4.  On 6 May 1991, 175 days after she entered active duty, the applicant's company commander notified her that he was initiating action to separate her from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for an inability to adapt to the military life.  He also informed the applicant that if approved, she would receive an entry level separation with uncharacterized service.  Furthermore, she would not be permitted to reenlist in the U.S. Army within 2 years from the date of separation.  

5.  On 6 May 1991, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the separation notification action, indicated that she did not desire to consult with counsel, and she elected not to submit a written statement in her own behalf.

6.  The applicant's company commander submitted a memorandum to the separation authority strongly recommending the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, due to her inability to mentally adapt to the military environment.  The commander stated the applicant expressed a very strong desire to be separated from the military and vocalized an apparent willingness to perform acts of misconduct in order to be discharged for misconduct.  

7.  The separation authority approved the unit commander's request, on 9 May 1991, and directed the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an uncharacterized entry level separation.

8.  On 14 May 1991, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  Block 24 (Character of Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows she received an "uncharacterized" characterization of service.  Block 25 (Separation Authority) shows that she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, chapter 11.  Block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows "entry level status."  This form also shows that she completed 6 months and 2 days of creditable active military service.

9.  There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members because of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both) while in an entry level status.  It states, in pertinent part, that separation under this chapter applies to Soldiers who are in an entry level status and, before the date of the initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty and have demonstrated that they cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life.  Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  It further states that the character of service for members separated under the provisions of this chapter will be uncharacterized. 

11.  Chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-200 describes the different types of characterization of service.  It provides, in pertinent part, that an uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation.

	a.  A separation will be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in an entry-level status, except when the characterization of under other than honorable conditions is authorized or when the Secretary of the Army, on a case-by-case basis, determines that a honorable discharge is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty.  For Regular Army Soldiers, entry-level status is the first 180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active duty following a break in service of more than 92 days of active military service.

	b.  An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
	c.  A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that her record should be corrected by changing her narrative reason for discharge and uncharacterized service to honorable was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, entry level status, with uncharacterized service, due to an inability to adapt to the military environment.  She failed to follow instructions and standards despite receiving rehabilitative support through performance counseling.  Ultimately, she failed her End of Annex examination and expressed a very strong desire to be separated from military service.

3.  Accordingly, her immediate commander initiated separation action against her on 6 May 1991, prior to her completing 180 days of continuous active service.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  During the first 180 days of continuous active military service, a member's service is under review.  When initiation of separation is within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  An honorable characterization may be given only if the service clearly warrants that characterization by unusual circumstances of personal conduct and performance of military duty and it is approved by the Secretary of the Army.

5.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.  As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for an honorable discharge.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002116



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002116



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012293

    Original file (20110012293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 1991, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 with an uncharacterized character of service. Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) confirms she was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 with an uncharacterized character of service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018311

    Original file (20110018311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the character of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from uncharacterized service to honorable service. The applicant's contention that her record should be corrected by changing the narrative reason and character of service of her uncharacterized entry level status discharge to an honorable discharge was carefully considered and determined to lack merit. Evidence shows the applicant was informed that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000769

    Original file (20140000769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows she entered active duty on 1 May 1991 and was discharged on 9 October 1991 UP AR 635-200, chapter 11, based on entry level status. The applicant contends that her uncharacterized discharge should be changed to honorable because she served to the best of her ability, there were no disciplinary problems with her during the period of service, and she was not evaluated for her medical conditions before she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014295

    Original file (20100014295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge and correction of the narrative reason for her separation from "entry level status performance and conduct" to "medical." The DD Form 214 she was issued confirms she was discharged from active duty by reason of entry level status performance and conduct in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an uncharacterized character of service. The service of Soldiers discharged from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003962

    Original file (20140003962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the character of service reflected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be upgraded from "uncharacterized" to "honorable." It also contains a 2nd Endorsement, dated 12 September 1991, subject: Proposed Discharge Action under the provisions of Trainee Discharge Program, which shows her discharge case had been reviewed and was approved under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012954

    Original file (20090012954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 9 January 1991, at a mental status evaluation the applicant's behavior was normal. The available evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was discharged within 180 days of her enlistment and was accordingly processed for separation under the regulatory provisions for entry level status performance and conduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005245C071029

    Original file (20070005245C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    To the contrary, the evidence of record shows that she was able to complete the run portion of the physical readiness test three times after this injury, the last time being on 11 January 1992, the day before she attempted suicide. The evidence of record shows the applicant wanted to be discharged from the Army. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013286

    Original file (20090013286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she received an honorable discharge instead of an uncharacterized discharge. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued confirms she was discharged due to entry level status performance and conduct in accordance with chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 with an uncharacterized character of service. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013625

    Original file (20140013625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states an uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation. The evidence of record, however, demonstrates, while she was in an entry-level status, she was not performing satisfactorily as a Soldier. By regulation, a separation will be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in an entry-level status (within the first 180 days of continuous active military service for Regular Army Soldiers), except when the characterization of under other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000894

    Original file (20130000894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to upgrade his uncharacterized characterization of service to honorable. His record contains two DA Forms 4856 (General Counseling Form), dated 19 August 1991 and 21 August 1991, which show he was counseled for: * being AWOL from 2 June 1991 to 1 July 1991 * initiation of separation proceedings in accordance with (IAW) Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 11 (Entry...