Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002073
Original file (20140002073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  5 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002073 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant’s MH diagnosis, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD section 4.130.  There were no dropped or changed diagnoses to the applicant's potential disadvantage.  Therefore the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP addressed the rating of the applicant's MH condition.  There was insufficient evidence that either of the applicant's MH diagnosis was due to a highly stressful event.  The SRP concluded there was not sufficient evidence to support the application of VASRD section 4.129 in this case.  The SRP assessed the entirety of the record for MH symptoms and occupational and social impairment under the general rating formula for mental disorders, to determine a higher rating.  

4.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP adjudged there was insufficient evidence to support a MH rating higher that 30 percent.  The SRP does not recommend any change in the applicant's rating.

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140002073



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006052

    Original file (20150006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013444

    Original file (20140013444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140013444 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The SRP determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015794

    Original file (20140015794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in or elimination of diagnoses of the MH condition to the possible disadvantage of the applicant during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). Both the MEB and the VA examiners specifically noted that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for PTSD were not met. The SRP next considered if the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021916

    Original file (20130021916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant's unfitting mental health (MH) condition diagnosis be changed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), coded 9411. The SRP determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001273

    Original file (20140001273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. The SRP adjudged that there was not a preponderance of the evidence to support a change of diagnosis to PTSD at TDRL entry. As a result, the Board recommends denial of the application that pertains to any change in the applicant's MH diagnoses and change in the applicant's MH permanent disability rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001339

    Original file (20140001339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013828

    Original file (20140013828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007367

    Original file (20140007367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined that a mental health diagnosis was not changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014913

    Original file (20140014913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses; physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015986

    Original file (20140015986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered that the VA MH assessments from June 2012, 4 months after TDRL entry, continued to support no higher than a 50 percent rating.