Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001753
Original file (20140001753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:     29 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001753 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests relief from a portion of the $10,964.00 debt he paid for overpayment of basic allowance for housing (BAH).

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  He was held accountable for an overpayment of BAH because he was misinformed of the specific requirements.  His request for remission of the debt was denied. 
   
   b.  He had a total loss of his vehicle and the liable individual had no insurance.  This caused him to purchase a new vehicle.  Between paying off the $10,964.00 debt and buying a new vehicle he is now in debt.  
   
   c.  He requests reimbursement of some of the $10,964.00 to relieve the hardship he is experiencing due to being in debt.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* 25 July 2013, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) memorandum, Subject:  Notice of Indebtedness
*  his 11 September 2013 DA Form 3508 (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with chain of command endorsements
* his December 2013 DFAS Form 702 (Leave and Earnings Statement)



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army captain. 

2.  A 25 July 2013 DFAS memorandum notified him that he was indebted to the U.S. Government in the amount of $10,964 for overpayment of BAH.

3.  On 11 September 2013, the applicant submitted an application for remission or cancellation of the indebtedness.  He stated that he married another service member prior to in-processing at the 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment.  He explained to the officials there that his spouse was also a service member and they advised him that one of them would receive BAH at the with-dependent rate, and one would receive BAH at the without dependents rate.  He did not realize until later that he was not authorized BAH at the with-dependent rate.  He immediately adjusted his BAH rate. 

4.  A 2 December 2013 HRC memorandum shows his request was disapproved. The memorandum indicates there were no grounds to remit or cancel the debt based on hardship or injustice.  He was advised he could petition the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records if he felt an injustice occurred.

5.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Compensation and Entitlements Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Washington, D.C.  That opining official determined the debt was valid and did not support granting full administrative relief and stated that the housing allowance for member-to member-couples that have no dependents is paid at the without dependent rate for their permanent duty station when government family-type quarters are not assigned.  Since the applicant has no other dependents, he is not entitled to receive a with-dependent housing allowance.

6.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comments or a rebuttal.  A response was not received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests relief from a portion of the $10,964.00 debt he paid for overpayment of BAH.  His request for remission of the debt was denied, and he has now had to buy a new vehicle and is experiencing the hardship of being in debt.

2.  The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that relief is warranted. 

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_  ___  __x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004019



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001753



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212

    Original file (2003090619C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009793

    Original file (20130009793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had DFAS processed his request, he would not have the debt. The form shows he requested to stop BAQ and that he had been assigned to government quarters. To determine injustice the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know and could not have known of the error and/or the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006402

    Original file (20120006402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated that after careful review of this case, it was their opinion that the applicant, a mobilized Reservist with a dependent, would be authorized BAH at the with-dependent rate based on his duty station of Fort Stewart, GA, at the time he was called to active duty. The regulation states, in pertinent part, that a Soldier's debts to the U.S. Army may be remitted or canceled in cases arising from payments made in error to a Soldier, payments made in excess of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006192

    Original file (20130006192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His original request for remission/cancellation of indebtedness was based on the fact that the overpayment was not due to any fault or error on his own part. On 15 February 2013, his application for remission or cancellation of his debt in the amount of $7,473.50 was disapproved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016673

    Original file (20100016673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission or cancellation of his debt to the Government in the amount of $19,452.97. A review of the applicant’s official records shows that prior to being appointed as an aviator warrant officer, the applicant served as a personnel sergeant responsible for the daily administration and operation of a personnel administration center servicing over 523 Soldiers and civilians in matters related to finance and personnel actions as well as many other types of actions. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006368C070208

    Original file (040006368C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 13 February 2004 Pay Adjustment Authorization shows that the applicant was overpaid for BAH (basic allowance for housing) in the amount of $23,102.91 from 8 January 1999 to 4 November 2003; and for FSH (Family Separation Housing) in the amount of $223.33 from 10 July 1999 to 16 September 1999. The Commandant of the Noncommissioned Officer Academy at Fort Eustis had previously requested that the applicant’s indebtedness be cancelled, stating that the debt would cause serious hardship for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017641

    Original file (20120017641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was informed by the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office, Fort Campbell, KY, that the BAH was not corrected and she had a BAH overpayment debt. However, there is no evidence in her available records and she has not provided evidence which shows the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office was in error when it approved BAH for her based on her DA Form 5960. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's available record that shows the Fort Campbell Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856

    Original file (20120004856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008485

    Original file (20140008485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Even after receiving this incorrect information, he still submitted a form to stop receiving BAH, yet it continued. The conclusion of DFAS was he should be responsible to pay back the BAH payments paid to him; however, they ignore the fact he turned in documents properly to include his divorce decree and BAH certifications and worked with unit leaders and the finance office to ensure he was paid correctly. c. The documents he previously submitted establish he was following Army guidance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02619

    Original file (BC 2013 02619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her debt which resulted from receiving Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) with dependent rate from 31 Mar 10 through 30 Apr 12 be cancelled. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends approving the applicant’s request based on the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) that states the applicant was entitled to the...