IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 August 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140001752
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his military record to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).
2. The applicant states:
a. he maintains he received the ARCOM after he left the Army in 1972;
b. he placed his ARCOM in a frame, hung it on the wall where he lived, and it went missing; and
c. he encloses a newspaper article that states a fire destroyed 18 million service members records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.
3. The applicant provides:
* self-authored statement
* two letters of support
* newspaper article
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130003032 on 12 September 2013.
2. The applicant provides two letters of support and a newspaper article. These documents are new evidence that were not previously reviewed and warrant consideration by Board.
3. During the original deliberations in this case, the Board determined he had served in the Republic of Vietnam from September 1969 to September 1970. However, there was insufficient evidence in the available records to show the applicant was awarded an ARCOM for his service. More specifically, in the absence of a formal recommendation for award of the ARCOM, approval through the chain command, and announcement of this award in orders, as required by Army regulation, there was no basis upon which to grant the applicant's request. Accordingly, his request was denied.
4. The applicant now provides two letters from individuals who support his claim to add the ARCOM to his military record and who indicate they witnessed the ARCOM hanging on the applicant's wall.
5. The applicant also provides a newspaper article that announces the award of the Silver Star to a former service member. It also reports 18 million service member's records were lost or destroyed in a fire in 1973.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show the ARCOM.
2. The applicant's service in the Republic of Vietnam and his sacrifices to the Nation are not in question. However, the original ABCMR decision advised the applicant that there are no orders, formal recommendation, certificate, or any other evidence available which indicates he was awarded the ARCOM. Accordingly and in response to the original decision, the applicant provides two letters of support and a newspaper article, as evidence to correct his record.
3. Nevertheless, while the applicant's sincerity is not in question, there is still insufficient evidence available to correct his record to show award of the ARCOM. For personal decorations, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement of orders are required. Regretfully, in the absence of the formal recommendation, approval, and orders, there still remains insufficient evidence to grant the applicant relief in this case based solely on the evidence he submitted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20130003032, dated 12 September 2013.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001752
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001752
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000906
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. He was awarded the Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star, the Combat Infantryman Badge, Presidential Unit Citation, National Defense Service Medal, and the United Nations Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022189
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show awards of the Purple Heart and Silver Star. There is no evidence in the reconstructed records that shows the applicant was awarded the Silver Star. Additionally, there is no evidence in his reconstructed records and he did not provide any conclusive evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001438
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001438 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded to a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed or who has died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the United States. His record is void...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009887
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. In the absence of any official corroborating evidence, the newspaper article provided by the applicant that states he was wounded in Korea is insufficient by itself as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015780
The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show two awards of the Purple Heart. It was awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of the Armed Forces or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, died or sustained wounds as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002701
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records are not available for review. While there is no official document that shows he was wounded as a result of enemy action and his wounds were treated and made a matter of record, the newspaper article provided by the applicant tends to suggest that he was, in fact, awarded the Purple Heart and that through administrative oversight,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011465
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM's military record is not available to the Board for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008993
The applicant states that he believes the FSM's records are incorrect because they do not show that he was wounded in action in Burma. Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the FSMs WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the Purple Heart and item 34 (Wounds) contains the entry "none" for wounds received in action. Witness statements and newspaper articles by themselves are not sufficient evidence upon which to base a correction of the FSM's records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019733
Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this decision to deny the Purple Heart in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation. Therefore, the Board requests that the ARBA CMD administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: * adding the Republic of Korea War Service Medal and Republic of Korea...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008128
The applicant states that he was recommended for award of the SS but was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The applicant's military records are not available for review. While the applicant contends that he was recommended for award of the SS and that the recommendation was downgraded, unfortunately the unsigned recommendation he submits with his request is not sufficient to conclude any error or injustice in this case.