IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 February 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140001244
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period October 1997 to February 1998 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR).
2. The applicant states in September 1997, he received promotion orders to the rank of sergeant; however, due to an error in his promotion points, it was subsequently discovered he was erroneously promoted. In February 1999, he was correctly promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT). Since he was not rated as a SGT until February 1999, he would like the evaluation removed to ensure his records are accurate.
3. The applicant provides:
* DA Form 2166-7
* Orders 026-617
* Enlisted Record Brief
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is currently a staff sergeant serving in the Regular Army.
2. The applicant's AMHRR contains a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 3 October 1997, that shows he successfully completed the Primary Leadership Development Course while in the rank of specialist.
3. The applicant's record does not contain a copy of orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in October 1997.
4. The applicant's record contains the following documents which show his rank as SGT:
a. A Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the Regular Army, dated 24 October 1997;
b. DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 26 November 1997;
c. DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 February 1998;
d. DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Certificate), dated 4 March 1998; and
e. A Special Course for Safety Management (Basic) Diploma, dated 22 January 1999.
5. The applicant provides:
a. Orders 026-617, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and Fort Campbell, KY, dated 26 January 1999, promoting him to the rank of SGT effective 1 February 1999.
b. The contested NCOER that lists his date of rank (DOR) as 3 October 1997.
c. An Enlisted Record Brief that shows his date of rank to SGT as 1 February 1999.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) provides, in pertinent part, that once a document is placed in the official military personnel file, it becomes a permanent part of that file. The document will not be removed from the fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).
7. Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR), paragraph 2-5 states, "The ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence."
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that the contested NCOER should be removed from his AMHRR has been carefully examined.
2. The complete facts and circumstances of the applicant's promotion history are not available for review; however, evidence exists which indicates the applicant was promoted on 3 October 1997, as evidenced by the DOR listed on the contested NCOER and the numerous documents contained in his AMHRR which list his rank as SGT throughout the period October 1997 through January 1999.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001244
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001244
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062896C070421
On 28 September 1992, the applicant submitted an appeal of the LOR to the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB), requesting that the LOR be filed in the R-fiche rather than the P-fiche portion of his OMPF. In addition, the Board noted that the applicable regulation does not provide for the local MPRJ filing in the applicant’s case based on his rank and years of service and that the applicant failed to inform the official making the filing determination that he already...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003630
BOARD DATE: 14 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The IG investigation indicated that he met the standard and that his promotion packet should have been sent forward to the promotion board. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicants service in the highest grade he held (pay grade E-6) was satisfactory.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017341
The Board noted that an Enlisted STAB denied the applicant's request to remove the DA QMP bar to reenlistment and that an Enlisted Special Review Board denied his request to remove the relief for cause NCOER. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 to show he was retired from active duty in the rank of SSG/pay grade E-6 with an effective date of pay grade of 1 August 1993. A letter from the applicant to DFAS, dated 12 May 2009, in which he stated that he retired from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022339
The contested NCOER was signed by the rating officials and the applicant on 9 March 1999. The applicant provides: a. Two quarterly counselings were missed for the months of December and September 1999; c. The rating was personal in nature and the ratings of the rater and senior rater were not consistent; and d. He did not challenge the report because he was promoted to SSG before the report was signed and he was advised that it would not have an impact on his career.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014860
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of his DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period 11 February through 7 July 2010 (5 rated months) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), referred to hereafter as the contested NCOER. The contested NCOER was signed by the applicant's rating officials on 16 and 17 September 2010.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077427C070215
In Part IIIf (Counseling Dates) the rater, a first lieutenant, indicated that the applicant had been initially counseled on 1 May, and received later counseling on 1 August and 5 November 1998. The following discrepancies were noted: no 30 day notice and remediation; the soldier was counseled on or about 5 October 1998 for unsatisfactory performance, and was relieved from his duties as a platoon sergeant and assigned to company headquarters on that same day; the contested report ran through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016376
The applicant requests the removal of the following documents from her Army Military Human Resource record (AMHRR): * DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 November 2009 * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period 10 September 2009 through 4 November 2009 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) 2. On 10 August 2011, she accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012436
(4) Part III(c) (Duty Description-Daily Duties and Scope) contains the entry "Serves as an [sic] Fire Support Sergeant in a light Infantry Battalion deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom " However, during that rated period he did not deploy in support of the listed operation and the duties and responsibilities listed on his NCOER do not match his actual duties and responsibilities. The applicant contends contested NCOER 1 should be removed from his AMHRR because during this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016157
The applicant provides: * General Court-Martial Order Number 44 * Relief for Cause (RFC) NCOER * Enlisted Record Brief * Four subsequent NCOERs since his RFC NCOER * Letters of support CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was promoted to staff sergeant on 1 June 2003. In other letters of support to remove the general court-martial order and RFC NCOER from the applicant's AMHRR, fellow Soldiers attest: a. while the applicant made a tremendous error of judgment in 2006, he faced the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003382
c. When Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-033, subject: (Updated) AAA-294 Enlisted Promotion Report Automatic List Integration Section for Staff Sergeant) was issued on 1 February 2008, he was never informed of its provisions and he was not aware of any action by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to put him on the standing list for promotion to SSG/E-6. The company commander, first sergeant, and the battalion command sergeant major formed negative opinions of him...