Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000969
Original file (20140000969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    26 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000969 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant’s disability and separation determination.

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant’s MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), fitness determination, and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD section 4.130. 

3.  The SRP noted that Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) had been diagnosed by the applicant's civilian providers after his initial meeting with them in March 2011 after the initial PEB.  Since no psychiatric diagnosis had been recorded prior to entry into the Disability Evaluation System (DES) and PTSD had been added and considered through the end of the DES, the SRP concluded that the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria for the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Panel.

4.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of the applicant’s diagnosis and concluded that although the evidence for a diagnosis of PTSD appeared to be somewhat marginal based on the available data, there did not appear to be a preponderance of evidence to support any other psychiatric disorder.  

5.  The SRP also considered the issue of fitness and determined there was no evidence of other than an S1 profile, and an Impartial Provider Review that supported the fact that the condition was not unfitting.  

6.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the evidence did not support any change in the PEB's diagnosis or fitness determination.

7.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  



      __________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140000969



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014269

    Original file (20140014269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. Its first assessment, under MH Review Project guidelines, was to judge whether a ratable MH diagnosis (either PTSD or anxiety disorder) was unfairly eliminated during DES proceedings. The SRP next considered whether there was preponderance of performance-based evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008316

    Original file (20150008316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change in the service determination. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, and the standard set forth above, the SRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010690

    Original file (20140010690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014925

    Original file (20140014925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010712

    Original file (20140010712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. In the service treatment record notes and at the VA C&P MH exam the applicant reported his main stressor during deployment was separation from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014936

    Original file (20140014936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP agreed therefore that there was not a preponderance of evidence to support an SRP recommendation for changing the MH diagnosis (anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS)) as adjudicated by the Service. Given the lack of corroboration of the reported DSM IV-TR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000297

    Original file (20140000297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant’s disability and retirement determination. The SRP considered the PEB’s adjudication at the time of removal from the TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000289

    Original file (20140000289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015391

    Original file (20140015391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also states that his rating for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) should have been higher and not rated with his other disabilities because they are different. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000940

    Original file (20140000940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant elaborated on a highly stressful incident (she witnessed the death of her boyfriend) that occurred while she was deployed to Iraq. The evidence in the DES record showed a diagnosis of depression.