Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000754
Original file (20140000754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000754 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he received in action on 13 May 1969.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter to the Honorable Clair McCaskill, dated 16 December 2013
* Privacy Act Release Form, dated 31 August 2013
* Letter to the Honorable Clair McCaskill, dated 13 August 2013
* Letter to Mr. Chris Holland (Undated)
* Letter to "Whom It May Concern" (Undated)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120019545, on 30 May 2013.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 30 April 1968.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.  He arrived in Vietnam on 16 October 1968.

3.  On 15 October 1969, the applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the United States.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 6 February 1970.

4.  The Purple Heart is not listed on the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam.

6.  A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain any documents that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces.

7.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

8.  The applicant provides letters from an individual who contends he was a combat medic in the unit to which he was assigned and a letter from a fellow Soldier who contends that the applicant was wounded in action on 13 May 1969, while he was in Vietnam.  He also provides a copy of a letter from the combat medic to the Honorable Claire McCaskill stating that he treated the applicant for wounds he received on 13 May 1969.  In the letter the medic states that this Board recognizes that the applicant was in battle and the only thing missing is the superior officer's failure to follow through and make sure that orders were published awarding him the Purple Heart.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), chapter 9, in effective at the time, provided for the preparation and submission of the DA Form 20.  Paragraph 9-53 states that item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 shows the wounds and reflects a brief description of wounds or injuries requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization and the date wounded or injured.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.  However, the letters provided by the applicant are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.

2.  Although the medic believes that the only thing missing in this scenario is the superior officer's failure to make sure that orders were published awarding the applicant the Purple Heart, that is not true.  If the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces, and if he (the medic) provided medical treatment, it was his responsibility to ensure that the treatment was made a matter of official record.

3.  There is no evidence contained in his OMPF showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam.  There is no entry made on his DA Form 20 and his name is not shown on The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20120019545, dated 3 June 2013.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000754



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000754



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012936

    Original file (20140012936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he received a shrapnel injury to his lower left leg from a possible booby trap while in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1968. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart based on an injury he sustained while in the RVN. In view of the above, the available evidence is insufficient to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015467

    Original file (20140015467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015994

    Original file (20140015994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no documentary evidence that shows the applicant was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His medical records, which would have listed any injuries and treatment, are not available for review with this case. The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020142

    Original file (20130020142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: a. the applicant's medical records show he was treated for wounds received during a rocket attack during the night of 13 and/or 14 April 1969; b. that Army Regulation 600-8-2 states in: (1) paragraph 2-8f, "when contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The applicant submitted: a. a letter to HRC, dated 18 January 2013, requesting retroactive award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001435

    Original file (20140001435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 10 December 1990 * Board Certified Orthopedic Surgeon Letter, dated 24 October 2013 * Photographs of his right and left legs CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004778

    Original file (20080004778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070009066 on 14 November 2007. The letters provided by the applicant are new evidence which will be considered by the Board. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017451

    Original file (20140017451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    What he can show as evidence is the enclosed copies of letters he received just prior to the wound. His DA Form 20 contains no entries that indicate he was wounded in action and there is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was treated for a combat-related wound. There is no such evidence in the applicant's military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021323

    Original file (20120021323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. An email, dated 23 January 2012, from a Verizon email user who states he was the unit medic at the time in question and that he treated the applicant for a small concussion at Vinh Kim after a mortar round knocked him off his feet in February 1969. c. A statement, dated 12 January 2012, from a radio telephone operator who served in the same unit at the time. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003235

    Original file (20120003235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that he sustained an injury to his right thumb as a result of enemy action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020500

    Original file (20120020500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add his award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...