Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000629
Original file (20140000629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:	  10 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000629 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he served an additional 7 years, that he is entitled to additional severance pay, and pay for accrued leave that he is due.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was only paid for 12 years of service instead of 19 years of service and he was informed by Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) officials that he needed to have a new DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service) prepared in order to receive the additional pay.  He also states that his severance pay was taxed and he did not get paid for 49 days of accrued leave.  He has been informed that this Board is the only authority that can correct these errors. 

3.  The applicant provides a three-page letter explaining his application, a two-page letter explaining his application, copies of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), discharge orders, email written to and received from DFAS, and enlistment documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) on     5 October 1989.  He completed his training and continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments and was promoted to pay grade E-5 on
16 June 2001.


2.  The applicant’s records show that he extended his enlistment on 
10 September 2000 for a period of 3 years, on 19 September 2004 for a period of    1 year, and on 15 August 2005 for a period of 6 years.

3.  On 15 February 2007, he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-5 for a period of 3 years and 2 months.

4.  On 29 March 2012, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4, due to disability with severance pay (non-combat) enhanced, in pay grade E-5.  He was paid disability severance pay for 12 years and 3 months of service as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1206. 

5.  The email provided by the applicant from DFAS officials dated 27 November 2013 informed the applicant that he did not have 49 days of accrued leave and that he took his accrued leave as terminal leave.  He was paid his normal pay entitlements during that period.  The applicant was also informed that he was paid severance pay for 12 years of service and that the check had not been returned.  Additionally, his severance pay was properly taxed as he was not injured in combat. 

6.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) who opines that after reviewing and performing mathematical calculations, the applicant was properly paid for 
12 years and 3 months of service.  HRC officials opine that administrative relief is not appropriate in the applicant’s case.

7.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he responded to the effect that he disagreed with the opinion as he was only paid for 12 years of service and did not receive pay for the additional 3 months and
5 days of service.  Additionally, he is owed $9,038.70 and back pay for 2 years.  He goes on to state that his Form W-2 (Wage and Tax Statement) indicates he was paid $109,205.41 which he did not receive and he is due a total of $45,934.51 in back pay and allowances.  He also provided a copy of his 2012 Form W-2 which shows that he earned $81,348.30.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his service was not properly computed and that he has not been properly compensated for his service has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  Officials at both HRC and DFAS have reviewed the circumstances of his case and both agencies agree that he has been properly paid for 12 years of service and that he is not entitled to pay for 19 years of service.

3.  While it is possible that a mistake in payments may have occurred, without copies of all of the applicant’s pay documents to include his Leave and Earnings Statements, leave forms, etc., from the date of his discharge, the Board cannot determine if such a mistake was in fact made.  Accordingly, the Board must rely on the information provided by DFAS regarding his pay.

4.  In regard to his service computation, the subject matter experts at HRC have reviewed his service records and re-calculated his service only to find that the calculations were correct to begin with and that he was properly compensated for 12 years and 3 months of service. 

5.  Therefore, absent sufficient evidence to show the service computations were incorrect and that the applicant has not been properly compensated for his service, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for additional service credit and compensation.

6.  In regard to the applicant’s contention that DFAS documents indicate he was paid more than he actually received, the applicant must contact the servicing DFAS to obtain an explanation for his question in that matter. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000629



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000629



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004278

    Original file (20130004278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests repayment of salary withheld by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in October, November, and December 2011; unpaid leave; back pay from a basic active service date (BASD) adjustment; and remitted debt. While he was still on active duty, DFAS collected $49,777.31 from his pay as noted on his October, November, and December 2011 DFAS Military Leave and Earnings Statements (LES). In an email, dated 24 October 2012, Ms. J______, DFAS, explained to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008967

    Original file (20120008967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was serving on active duty until 15 May 2009, and if the recommendation as stated throughout the opinion to change the 48 days of accrued leave to transition leave is approved, then the release date should be 2 June 2009. As stated in paragraph 2b of the opinion memorandum, "Given the lack of removal documentation through 15 May 2009, there is an implied duty status"; therefore, his service time should have ended on 15 May 2009, not 24 March 2009 as evidenced by valid orders and time and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016802

    Original file (20120016802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the payment of 30 days of Post-Deployment/ Mobilization Respite Absence (PDMRA) leave. When he was released from active duty (REFRAD) he was informed he was entitled to 30 days of PDMRA leave and, as he was returned to a retired status, he could request the 30 days in the form of pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was mobilized as a Retiree Recall and he served on active duty for 2 years from 23 April 2006 to 22 April 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007725

    Original file (20140007725 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he elected to have his PDMRA added to his active duty time and his PDMRA was incorrectly calculated as being only 1 day instead of 25 days which denied him additional active duty time, pay and allowances for 24 additional days of leave time, 24 retirement points, 24 days of Tri-care, and 24 days of TAMP benefits. Soldiers unable to utilize accrued PDMRA days during their current mobilization order may be voluntarily retained on active duty under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007725

    Original file (20140007725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he elected to have his PDMRA added to his active duty time and his PDMRA was incorrectly calculated as being only 1 day instead of 25 days which denied him additional active duty time, pay and allowances for 24 additional days of leave time, 24 retirement points, 24 days of Tri-care, and 24 days of TAMP benefits. Soldiers unable to utilize accrued PDMRA days during their current mobilization order may be voluntarily retained on active duty under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020107

    Original file (20130020107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2013, HRC disapproved his request for PDMRA under GA2 and opined that the applicant was not eligible for PDMRA benefits because the law governing PDMRA benefits required that a minimum of 50% of time be spent with boots on the ground in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Kuwait. Although the applicant has not provided any evidence to show that he was unaware of or not properly counseled in regard to PDMRA, it does not appear that he was entitled to accrue PDMRA benefits during his deployment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014049

    Original file (20110014049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The record is void of any documents indicating the applicant requested and/or was denied the use of PDMRA during the mobilization/deployment period in which it was earned. The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant is void of any documentary evidence indicating the applicant requested and was denied PDMRA during the period of active duty in which it was earned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004700

    Original file (20090004700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to rectify the multiple errors, it is appropriate to correct the record to show that the applicant had 20 qualifying years of service as of 25 May 1992, that he was issued a proper 20-year letter, that he elected to receive non-regular retirement in lieu of disability severance pay, that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve 26 May 1992 with entitlement to retired pay upon attaining age 60, and that he was placed on the Retired List effective 26 June 2008 with entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010630C070208

    Original file (20040010630C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040010630 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Patrick McGann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The computation made by the staff member of the Board resulted in a computation of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002348

    Original file (20110002348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon nearing completion of his 2 years in Iraq, his brigade S-1 calculated both his leave days and PDMRA days from his release from active duty (REFRAD) date. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was serving on active duty during the period 5 May 2010 to 10 May 2010. However, the evidence of record shows he was REFRAD on 4 May 2010.