Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000263
Original file (20140000263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000263 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded a combat award/ribbon.

2.  The applicant states that he deserves a combat award/ribbon because he received combat pay and was under constant attack. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 March 1968 for a period of    3 years and training as a field wireman.  He completed his basic training at Fort Lewis, Washington and his advanced individual training at Fort Ord, California and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas for his first duty assignment.

3.  On 22 January 1969, he was transferred to Vietnam for assignment to  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 212th Combat Aviation Battalion as a wireman.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 15 August 1969 and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a radio teletype operator.  He was assigned to a radio teletype chief position and remained in that position until he departed Vietnam on 21 January 1970 for assignment to Fort Sill, Oklahoma.  

4.  On 11 January 1971, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) early to attend school.  He had served 2 years, 10 months, and 8 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal with device (1960), and the Good Conduct Medal.

5.  A review of his official records failed to show any additional awards and there is no indication that he was recommended for any individual awards.  There is also no evidence of the applicant actually engaging the enemy in combat.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of an act, achievement, or service believed to warrant the award of a decoration to submit a formal recommendation into military command channels for consideration within 2 years of the act, achievement, or service to be honored.  The Army does not condone self-recognition; therefore, a Soldier may not recommend himself/herself for award of a decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded a combat award/ribbon for his service in Vietnam has been noted.

2.  While it is not the intent to diminish the applicant’s service in Vietnam or to his country, the responsibility for recommending individuals for awards lies primarily with the individual’s chain of command who is in the best position to evaluate individual performance and the need to recognize deserving individuals with awards.

3.  Unfortunately, the applicant has failed to provide any evidence to show that he should have received an award other than what has already been awarded. 

4.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000595



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000263



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002730

    Original file (20090002730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman position. However, the three criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge is to be assigned to an infantry unit, perform infantry duties, and hold an infantry specialty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013787

    Original file (20070013787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation date of 7 September 1970 be corrected to show two duty position titles that he held while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015767

    Original file (20110015767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He departed Germany on 9 June 1969 and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 10 June 1969 as an overseas returnee. The evidence of record shows that he was attached to a Special Forces Detachment as a field wireman and not as a radio operator.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003920

    Original file (20110003920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there are no orders or any other evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded 67N or any other 67-series MOS as his PMOS. Thus, item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the correct PMOS code and title. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's military service records or the entry in item 23a of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007005

    Original file (20090007005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded and/or served in an infantry MOS, or that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. It provides that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006126C070206

    Original file (20050006126C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) specifically governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. The evidence also shows the applicant is entitled to one silver service star and one bronze service star on his Vietnam Service Medal, two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Civil...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012600

    Original file (20090012600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, evidence shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 January 1967 to 3 November 1968; c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014297

    Original file (20110014297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 January 1969. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the199th Infantry Brigade and to the 1st Armor Calvary Division in what appears to be MOS 05C, there is no evidence to show he was TDY in support of the Cambodian Incursion and personally present...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007988

    Original file (20120007988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant completed a period of qualifying service for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 June 1969 through 7 March 1971; b. deleting the entry "VN SERVICE: None" from item 30 of his DD Form 214; c. adding the entry "Indochina - No; Vietnam - No; Korea - Yes"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009322

    Original file (20090009322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After serving his initial permanent duty assignment at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, he departed for the Republic of Vietnam on 24 October 1966 and was assigned to Company A, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, first as a Field Wireman in duty MOS 36K and later as a Senior Wireman in duty MOS 36K. The applicant's military records do not show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and there are no special orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge in his military records. ...