Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022434
Original file (20130022434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130022434 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal as well as correction to item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title, and Years and Months in Specialty).

2.  The applicant states item 11 of his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists his years and months in his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 75 years, 9 months.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a memorandum
* DD Form 214
* a letter from the State of Illinois Department of Veterans' Affairs

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 September 1981.  His        DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) indicates he successfully completed training and he was awarded MOS 95B (Military Police) on 14 December 1981 and he was honorably released from active duty on 29 August 1984, a period of 2 years, 8 months, and 16 days.  The applicant was not available to sign his DD Form 214 upon his release from active duty. 

3.  The applicant provides and his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows he was honorably released from active duty on 29 August 1984.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of active service during this period; however, it fails to show he was awarded or authorized the Army Achievement Medal.  In addition, item 11 of this form lists his years and months in his primary specialty as 75 years, 9 months.

4.  The applicant provides a memorandum, issued by Headquarters, 3d Armored Division Artillery, dated 13 August 1984, which references the presentation of an Army Achievement Medal to the applicant based on Permanent Orders Number 28-3; however, the applicant does not provide and his records do not contain the actual order authorizing award of the Army Achievement Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time,  prescribed the separation documents which were prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the        DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It states for            item 11 to enter the titles of all MOS' or areas of concentration served in for at least one year and include the number of years and months served.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Ordinarily, orders are required to substantiate a past award of the Army Achievement Medal; however, the applicant provides a memorandum, issued by Headquarters, 3d Armored Division Artillery, dated 13 August 1984, which indicates he was to be presented the Army Achievement Medal based on Permanent Orders Number 28-3.  This lends credence to his contention that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.  

2.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 29 August 1984 and he was not available to sign his DD Form 214 upon his release from active duty.  It is reasonable to presume he was on terminal leave with his records and the order subsequently never made it into his records.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

3.  Item 11 of the applicant's DD Form 214 clearly contains a typographical error. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded MOS 95B on              14 December 1981 and he was released from active duty on 29 August 1984, a period of 2 years, 8 months, and 16 days.  Therefore, item 11 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed 2 years and 9 months in his given specialty.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by adding the Army Achievement Medal and by deleting the entry in item 11 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "P95B1O  MILITARY POLICE  2 YRS  09 MOS."




      ____________x_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022434



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022434



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001193

    Original file (20080001193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests that two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Noncommissioned Officers Professional Development Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar be added to this DD Form 214. Since the applicant was promoted to E-4 in the USAR in MOS 64C on 29 April 1985, one year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending items 4a, 4b, and 11 on his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016804

    Original file (20140016804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or his military service records to show he: a. held military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 75C (Personnel Management Specialist) while serving in Active Reserve units; b. was awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003438

    Original file (20090003438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal. The certificate for award of the Army Achievement Medal, as provided by the applicant, indicates he received this award for meritorious service during the period from 4 April 1984 through 27 October 1985 while serving with the 527th Military Police Company. _______ _ XXX_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015080

    Original file (20140015080.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 8 January 2002 to 7 January 2003 to show in: a. item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) that he held the rank of sergeant (SGT) rather than specialist (SPC); b. item 4b (Pay Grade) that he held the pay grade of E-5 rather than E-4; c. item 11 (Primary Specialty) that he also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012091

    Original file (20110012091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) awarded him in January 1999 should be added to item 13 of his DD Form 214; b. the following entries should be added to item 14 of his DD Form 214: * Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Training (December 1997) * Advanced Techniques in Evidence and Property Management (April 1997) * Interview and Interrogations (August 1997) * Military Police Advanced Noncommissioned Officer's Course (ANCOC) (June 1996) * Managing Criminal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083037C070215

    Original file (2002083037C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by adding three Army Achievement Medals, the Multinational Force and Observers Medal, the Dutch UZI-Machinegun Qualification Badge, his promotion to sergeant and a change in his MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) from 11B to 95B. The Dutch UZI-Machinegun Qualification Badge is not listed as an authorized foreign badge in Appendix D, Army Regulation 600-8-22, and there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009970

    Original file (20080009970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; Army Commendation Medal; Army Achievement Medal; Good Conduct Medal; Army Service Ribbon; and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol, and Grenade Bars. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Records show the applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012287

    Original file (20060012287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB), the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), the Driver’s Badge and that his records be corrected to reflect his qualifications with the machinegun and hand grenade, his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with “M” Device, his inactive service in the delayed entry program (DEP), his correct Social Security Account Number (SSAN), and his attendance at the law enforcement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011799

    Original file (20080011799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). The available evidence shows the applicant was eligible for award of the GCM for the period 21 June 1979 through 20 June 1982. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086025C070212

    Original file (2003086025C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 23 August 1984 in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, section IV, as a result of court-martial. After reviewing the applicant service record, the Board found no basis upon which to grant clemency and an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.