IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 August 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130022312
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of the reentry eligibility (RE)RE) code of "3" that was entered on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
2. He states that the record is in error due to clerical error. He also states, in effect, he was both told and saw on other forms that he would be receiving an
RE code of "1" in recognition of his excellent record and behavior.
3. He provides his DD Form 214 and Honorable Discharge Certificate.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 May 2011.
2. The complete facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case. However, his record contains a DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged from the Army on 5 July 2012 after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 26 days of active service. His DD Form 214 also shows:
* he was not awarded a military occupational specialty
* his service was characterized as honorable
* the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 13-2e
* his separation program designator (SPD) code was JFT
* his RE code was 3
* his narrative reason for separation was "Physical Standards"
3. A review of the Soldier Management System database maintained by the Department of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command revealed that the applicant's physical profile was 111111 at the time of his separation, which indicates that he had no medical limitations annotated in the Military Physical Profile Serial System.
4. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was informed that he would be assigned an RE code of "1" in conjunction with his separation.
5. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13, paragraph 13-2e states initiation of separation proceedings is required for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test, unless the responsible commander chooses to impose a bar to reenlistment per Army Regulation 601-280 (Total Army Retention Program). The regulation requires that separation action be taken when in the commanders judgment the individual will not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further military training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance under this regulation is characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 further states individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty.
7. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing in the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard. Table 3-1 includes a list of RE codes.
a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their terms of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.
b. RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.
8. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that SPD code JFT is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-2e, by reason of Physical Standards. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code 3 will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of JFT.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his RE code should be changed was carefully considered.
2. The available evidence indicates the applicant was separated for being unqualified for active duty due to failing to achieve and maintain physical standards by failing two consecutive record APFTs. Accordingly, he was assigned an RE code of 3 that is consistent with the reason for separation. He failed to show his assigned RE code is in error or unjust.
3. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was informed that he would be assigned an RE code of "1" in conjunction with his separation. Therefore, there is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant's disqualification that established the basis for the assigned RE code of 3.
4. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, administrative regularity is presumed in the applicant's separation process.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
6. The applicant is advised that RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service; however it does allow for a waiver of disqualification. Therefore, if he desires to reenter military service, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process RE code waivers.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x____________-
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130022312
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130022312
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019260
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 3. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-2e, by reason of physical standards. Based on his separation under this provision, he was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3 at the time of discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008315
The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 5500 (Body Fat Content Worksheet) dated 23 March 2010 * DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard) dated 7 September 2010 * DA Form 705, dated 29 October 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. However, his DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 6 January 2011, under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 13-2e, for physical standards. The SPD code of JFT was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000987
Army Regulation 635-200 states individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty. This code will not be used. The evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-2e.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024103
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) listing his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and by changing the following: * Reentry eligibility (RE) code * Separation program designator (SPD) code * Narrative reason for separation 2. Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities, reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. This regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088131C070403
The unit commander recommended that the applicant be separated based on the EPSBD results in Item 25 (Action by Unit Commander) of the DA Form 4707. The statement from the 94th RSC sergeant confirms that the applicant was processed for enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in 1996, but was denied due to medical reasons. The evidence further confirms that although he had the option to disagree with the EPSBD findings and recommendations and/or to request retention on active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088497C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: Such conditions must be discovered during the first six months of active duty, and such findings will result in an EPSBD.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003953
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service is too harsh and as a result it is inequitable based on the following reasons: a. overall length and quality (i.e., ARCOM, AAM, and AGCM) of the applicants service to include his combat service and his DD Form 214 shows he completed 6 years, 4 months and 14 days of active military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016100
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure of two consecutive record Army Physical Fitness Tests, with an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140003607
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and notwithstanding the examiners Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the applicant's service and the circumstances surrounding the discharge (no derogatory information) were not significantly meritorious to overcome the events that caused his separation from the Army, and as a result, the discharge was found to be proper and equitable. On 3 December...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022330
Applicant Name: ????? Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the characterization of service be changed to "Honorable" and the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214 be changed to "Physical Standards" with the corresponding separation code of "JFT." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: "Physical Standards" under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 13-2e, with the...