Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021714
Original file (20130021714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  5 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021714 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he met the criteria for award of the AGCM but it was not awarded to him. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and his discharge orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 March 1967 for a period of 
3 years and training as an aviation navigation equipment repairman.  He completed basic training at Fort Benning, Georgia and advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia and he was transferred to Vietnam on 
1 December 1967.

3.  He was assigned to the 610th Transportation Company and was subsequently attached to the 143rd Signal Detachment.  He served in five campaigns and departed Vietnam on 30 November 1968, he was transferred to Fort Stewart, Georgia and then to Corpus Christi, Texas.

4.  He was again transferred to Vietnam on 15 July 1969 and he was assigned to Company A, 1st Transportation Corps Battalion, United States Naval Ship Corpus Christi Bay.  He served in two campaigns and departed Vietnam on 
11 March 1970; he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 March 1970 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 15 days of active service.  The DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Vietnam Service Medal.

5.  A review of his official records shows that he had “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant’s unit(s) was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit(s).  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star, based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B will be worn on the appropriate service medal.  A silver service star is worn in lieu of five bronze service stars.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM (1st Award) for his service from 
28 March 1967 through 12 March 1970.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM (1st Award) and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.

2.  The applicant served in seven campaigns and thus is entitled to wear one silver and two bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to have them added to his DD Form 214.

3.  Additionally, the applicant’s unit(s) was awarded the MUC and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit(s).  Accordingly, he is entitled to have these awards added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x___  ____x ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214
* Awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his service from 28 March 1967 through 12 March 1970
* Adding the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver and two bronze service stars, AGCM (1st Award), MUC, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021714



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021714



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018134

    Original file (20140018134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Based on his service in Vietnam, he is authorized award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003691

    Original file (20130003691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) – seven awards * six bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) 2. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001679

    Original file (20120001679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. permanent orders awarded the applicant the MSM (3rd Award) for the period 12 October 1999 to 30 November 2000; b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he served in six campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the AGCM (3rd Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his 30 November 2000 DD Form 214 to show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019116

    Original file (20110019116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his awards of the Silver Star, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). On 9 October 1968, General Orders Number 10618 issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division awarded the applicant the Silver Star for gallantry while serving as a perimeter guard on 29 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007102

    Original file (20090007102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 15 September 1968. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016252

    Original file (20100016252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation provides for wear of one bronze service star on the appropriate service medal, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each campaign participation credit. After carefully examining the applicant's record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 26 January 1966 through 25 January 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010009

    Original file (20120010009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 13 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010009 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star, Vietnam Campaign Medal with device “60,” and the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010204

    Original file (20090010204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Air Medal (AM), CIB, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 and M-16) and Machinegun (M-60) Bars, and two overseas service bars. Thus, these awards should also be added to his record and DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015169

    Original file (20110015169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) * Purple Heart with one Oak Leaf Cluster * Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device and Numeral 7 * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one silver and two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) * RVN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010578

    Original file (20130010578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. The applicant was serving as an infantryman in an infantry unit when he was cited for award of the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroism in connection with military operations against a hostile force in Vietnam which is sufficient evidence to show he was authorized award of the CIB. As a result, the Board...