Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021665
Original file (20130021665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021665 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4" to a more favorable reentry (RE) code.

2.  The applicant states his current RE code is unjust because he turned himself in after being absent without leave (AWOL) for 27 days from combat basic training (CBT).  He contends, in effect, that he was young when he went AWOL.  Prior to reporting the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), he got into a terrible car accident in which several people were injured and one died.  During his training and while on a live fire exercise he was notified by a civilian insurance company attorney that no matter where he went the deceased family would make sure he was sued for the accident.  This scared him and because he was an infantryman he started to think that he could not only end up losing his life or limbs but also everything he fought for because of this lawsuit.  It would be an honor to be given the opportunity to serve his country again.

3.  The applicant provides information related to ongoing ligation in two cases where he is named defendant.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 April 2002.  His record shows his date of birth 19 July 1982.  He was 19 years of age when he enlisted.  

3.  A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet) shows he was charged with being AWOL from 2 July 2002 to 8 August 2002.

4.  After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 on 16 August 2002.  In his voluntary request for discharge, he acknowledged he was guilty of the charge against him or a lesser included offense which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He indicated he understood if his request was accepted he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions.  He further acknowledged he understood that as a result of the issuance of such a discharge, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law, and encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life.  He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

5.  On 4 September 2002, the separation authority approved his request and directed that he be discharged with an entry level separation.  On 20 September 2002, he was discharged accordingly.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 months and 3 days of net active service.  The form shows in:

* item 24 (Character of Service) - "uncharacterized"
* item 25 (Separation Authority) - "AR 635-200, chap 10"
* item 26 (Separation Code) - "KFS"
* item 27 (RE Code) - "4"

7.  He submits information generated from the internet which shows he was the defendant in two previous lawsuits brought by two separate insurance companies seeking damages as the result of an accident caused by the applicant where he was determined to be an uninsured driver and driving without permission.
8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  

	a.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-9a(1) states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case.

	c.  Entry-level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active service after a service break of more than 
92 days of active service.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states separation code "KFS" applies to Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.

10.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, shows that Soldiers given an SPD code of "KFS" will be given an RE code of 4.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 provides a list of the RE codes.  RE code "4" applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.
	


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He requests a more favorable RE code.

2.  His record shows he was 19 years of age at the time of his unauthorized absence and his circumstances were clearly traumatic.  The fact that he turned himself in is also noted but does not negate his misconduct.  The evidence of record shows he was charged with and admitted he was guilty of an offense that authorized the imposition of a punitive discharge, and he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  All requirements of law and regulation were met, and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3.  RE code "4" is associated with discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  This RE code is properly shown on his DD Form 214.  His desire to reenter the Army is insufficient reason to change an RE code properly assigned as a result of his voluntary request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021665



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021665



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024706

    Original file (20110024706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge or higher * change of his reentry (RE) code "4" to "2" or above * change of his separation code so he can enlist in the Army National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) 2. On 28 August 2009, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015418

    Original file (AR20130015418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests an upgrade of the applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge, a change to the narrative reason for discharge, and restoration of the applicant’s rank. Counsel provided evidence that indicates on 18 September 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 7 October 2006, with a characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012426

    Original file (AR20100012426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013104

    Original file (20090013104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 2003, the applicant was accordingly discharged. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. The evidence of record further confirms that the applicant's RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 in lieu of a trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005145

    Original file (20090005145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgraded his discharge to a general discharge but neglected to correct his Separation Code. The evidence of record further confirms the applicant’s Separation Code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009417C070205

    Original file (20060009417C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In his request the applicant stated he understood he could request discharge for the good of the service because charges had been filed against him under the UCMJ, which could authorize the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009595

    Original file (20090009595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. He states the Board should consider upgrading his discharge and RE code in order for him to be reinstated within the U.S. Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024089

    Original file (20100024089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request for a chapter 10 discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial conviction and the punitive discharge that he might have received.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013354

    Original file (20100013354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his discharge characterization and the reason for his discharge be changed to an uncharacterized discharge. As evidence to support his application, the applicant provided his ARNG discharge orders and NGB Form 22 showing he was discharged on 21 June 2001 with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states that a separation will be described as entry level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011627

    Original file (20090011627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 April 2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), for the good of the service and that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 also shows that his character of service was under other than honorable conditions; the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 10; the separation code was "KFS"; his RE code was RE-4; and...