Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021620
Original file (20130021620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  9 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021620 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he had more than 6 months of active duty service.

2.  The applicant states the 1973 fire that destroyed many of veterans records apparently included his.  He received a Certification of Military Service which does not give an accurate timeline of his service in the Army.  Credit was not given him for the actual 6 months plus he served on active duty.  He enlisted on 25 October 1956 (he mentioned 4 October 1956 on the VA Form 26-1880) in Walla Walla, WA and was discharged on 3 October 1964.  He started basic training in October 1958 and attended advanced individual training from              1 January 1959 until mid-April 1959, when he received orders to return to Walla Walla.  He served in the Reserves for 8 years and believes the correction is warranted.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a Certification of Military Service, a DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 26-1880 (Request for a Certificate of Eligibility), and a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  It is believed the applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the NPRC fire of 1973.  Information herein was obtained from documents provided by the applicant and a limited number of documents related to his period of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) in 1958 - 1959.

3.  The applicant reports he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on either 4 or 25 October 1956.

4.  On 26 October 1958, he entered ACDUTRA to complete military occupational specialty training.  A DD Form 214 shows ACDUTRA service from 26 October 1958 through 25 April 1959 with 2 years and 22 days of other service.  He was released from ACDUTRA and transferred to Battery C, 736th Field Artillery Battalion, Walla Walla, Washington.

5.  Other than the notation on the DD Form 214, there is no available documentation related to his USAR service either prior to or subsequent to his 
6-month period of ACDUTRA.  However, 2 years and 22 days of other service would equate to an enlistment date of 4 October 1956.  His DD Form 214 also shows his military service obligation date terminated on 3 October 1964.

7.  The Certification of Military Service, issued 30 March 2012, lists the applicant's active service in the USAR as from 26 October 1958 through 25 April 1959.  A note at the bottom of the Certification of Military Service states it is issued in the absence of a copy of the actual Report of Separation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 at the time prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-


cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

9.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The ABCMR is not an investigative body.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While it is clear that the applicant had additional USAR service, without additional documentation as to the specific dates of enlistment and discharge correction of his Certification of Military Service (which is not an Army record; this Board cannot correct it) cannot be properly completed.

2.  However, in any case a Certification of Military Service only reports active service, as a replacement for a lost DD Form 214.  And since a DD Form 214 only records active service it appears the Certification of Military Service accurately reports his active military service.

3.  The applicant should note that his DD Form 214 appears to accurately report his date of enlistment in the USAR (4 October 1956, based upon 2 years and 22 days of other service).  In addition, it appears to accurately report his discharge date from the USAR – he states he was discharged on 3 October 1964 and his DD Form 214 shows his military service obligation terminated on 3 October 1964.  Unfortunately, his actual discharge orders are not available.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  _x_______  _x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021620





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021620



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026710

    Original file (20100026710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 January 1962, by personnel action, the applicant requested release from active duty, if eligible, based on erroneous order to active duty from the Standby Reserve. There is no evidence he served on active duty between the date he was released from active duty on 20 February 1962 and the date he was ultimately discharged from the USAR on 31 May 1964 upon completion of his military service obligation. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007936

    Original file (20110007936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he served under the last name of “Mi--ie--cz”; however, in 1974 he had his last name changed to “McKay” and he desires to have his DD Form 214 corrected to prove his service and for his family records. He had served 6 months of ACDUTRA and his DD Form 214 reflects his last name as “Mi--ie--cz”. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009506

    Original file (20120009506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his combat service in the Republics of Korea and Vietnam are not documented in his military records. The evidence of record further shows he served in the Republic of Korea, from 16 October 1971 to 15 November 1972; however, this service is not reflected in items 19 or 27 of his last DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 19 of his DD Form 214, for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001844

    Original file (20140001844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his tour of duty began with 2 months of additional training; however, following the completion of that training, the remainder of his time on active duty was spent training raw recruits. A DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) indicates in item 18 (Record of Assignments) that he performed the following duties during his period of ACDUTRA: * 19 July 1959 - Casual en route to Fort Benning, GA * 20 July 1959 - Student Officer IOBC * 16 September 1959 - Casual en route...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000703

    Original file (20130000703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 20 October 1959 to show the Airborne Course * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 1965, to show in: * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010922

    Original file (20120010922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a DA Form 1301 (Army Reserve Officer Evaluation Report) for the period 12 January 1959 to 16 April 1959 during which he was performing active duty for training. This section is also applicable to 6 months active duty for training personnel. The evidence of record shows the entries in items 11c and 19 of his DD Form 214 are correct; therefore, no correction to this form is necessary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002026

    Original file (20110002026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected categories of military personnel including Reserve Component Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. He was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of active duty. However, the evidence of record indicates that all of his active duty service was active duty for training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006655

    Original file (20110006655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 does not list the AFEM and CIB. However, there is no evidence of record and he has provided insufficient evidence to show he served in Taiwan. Even if he served in Taiwan, the DA Form 2-1 was prepared and maintained for active Army personnel during their active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000931C070206

    Original file (20050000931C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 currently indicates he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA), but it should read he was ordered to active duty to fulfill the requirements of his Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) contract. However, there is an insufficient evidence to support granting this requested relief. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000931C070206

    Original file (20050000931C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 currently indicates he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA), but it should read he was ordered to active duty to fulfill the requirements of his Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) contract. However, there is an insufficient evidence to support granting this requested relief. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear,...