Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021248
Original file (20130021248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  15 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021248 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he received the award but it does not show as an accomplishment in his formal records.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a newspaper article.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 June 1969 and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) upon completion of initial entry training.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 21 March 1970 to 
19 March 1971;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry while in Vietnam;

	c.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations), the CIB is not included as an authorized award.

4.  His available military records are void of orders or any other document that indicates he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 20 March 1971.  His DD Form 214 does not include the CIB as an authorized award.

6.  He provides a copy of a newspaper article indicating he was awarded the CIB while assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the CIB has been carefully considered.

2.  The evidence shows he was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served with an infantry unit in Vietnam.  However, it does not sufficiently show he engaged in active ground combat while assigned to this unit.  In the absence of orders or any other documents indicating he was recommended for or awarded the CIB, the documentation provided does not show he engaged in active ground combat therefore the newspaper article in itself is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is sn insufficient evidentiary basis for granting her applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  _x_______  ___x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021248



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021248



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022275

    Original file (20130022275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120010441, on 11 December 2012. The applicant provides a military pay voucher, dated 16 July 1970, which shows he was assigned to Company E, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry. The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention he was a member of the 1st Battalion, not the 5th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018777

    Original file (20130018777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence shows the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry company during his assignment in Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004261

    Original file (20080004261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 19 June 1970. The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 5 June 1971 to 28 March 1972. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021531

    Original file (20130021531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF BOARD DATE: 29 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021531 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision promulgated in Docket Number AR20130001373, dated 13 August 2013, wherein he requested correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024164

    Original file (20110024164 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received in action on 27 April 1971, in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and was not awarded the CIB. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, this unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 1 March 1971 to 9 October 1971 based on Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024765

    Original file (20110024765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018812

    Original file (20110018812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, his military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The fact that the applicant provided a newspaper article that indicates he was awarded the CIB is not sufficient evidence to conclude that he is entitled to this award. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088184C070403

    Original file (2003088184C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The available evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action and entitled to an award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the CIB and showing that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008292

    Original file (20130008292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, while assigned to 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, he served as an infantryman in combat from 1970 through 1971. However, aside from his own statement, there is no evidence of record to show he ever served in active ground combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021855

    Original file (20110021855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also provided a certificate which shows he was awarded the CIB. His DD Form 214 shows he received the following awards: * BSM * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * 2 overseas service bars 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from his DD Form...