Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019660
Original file (20130019660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  19 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019660 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and reimbursement of all premiums deducted from her retirement pay.  

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  she did not have a good understanding of the program when she first signed up, besides her divorce became final right before she left the military;

	b.  she had her spouse removed and she wanted the children to be removed as well;

	c.  she has several other means by which to take care of her children in case of her demise;

	d.  she has tried to be removed from the SBP since July 2013;

	e.  she never meant to be in this program in the first place.  She was told that it was mandatory until she received her divorce decree, which "she did not receive until the end of June"; and

	f.  she needs her request granted in order to inform the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to stop deducting premiums from her retired pay and to return her premiums.
  
3.  She provides:

* DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate)
* Divorce decree
* Letters of explanation for opting out of SBP 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 10 June 1992.  She was discharged on 10 January 1994 for enlistment in the Regular Army (RA).  On 11 January 1994, she enlisted in the RA and was released from active duty on 3 October 1998.  On the following day, she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

2.  On 1 November 1998, she was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve status.  She was married on 31 December 2002.

3.  On 11 April 2011, she completed a DD Form 2656 and she enrolled in the SBP for spouse and child coverage based on full gross pay.  

4.  She was divorced on 25 June 2013.  On 2 July 2013, she submitted a DD Form 2656-6 to change her SBP election based on her divorce.  

5.  On 31 July 2013, she retired for length of service.

6.  She provided three letters of explanation in which she stated, in effect:

	a.  she would like to suspend her SBP due to the fact that she was divorced before leaving active duty (Active Guard Reserve);  

	b.  she's requesting a refund of the premiums that were deducted from her retired pay for the months of August and September (2013) and any others that may follow;

	c.  her monthly premiums of $117.23 should not have been taken out because she resubmitted a request to stop payment of SBP premiums before
31 July 2013;

	d.  the SBP spouse coverage has stopped, but premiums are still being subtracted for child coverage;

	e.  in hindsight, had she known then what she knows now, she would not have signed a paper in reference to the SBP program;
	f.  during transitioning, she was told that it was mandatory so she misunderstood and placed all her Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System dependents on the form;

	g.  once she discovered that she did not have to include her children and knowing that she was in the process of a divorce she would not have included the children or signed a form at all;

	h.  she is requesting to opt out of the program because she has ample insurance for her children regardless of their age unlike the SBP which only covers them until young adulthood; and

	i.  according to DFAS, the approval must come from this Board before they can rule out her children.  

7.  Information obtained from DFAS indicates the applicant's SBP election is listed for child only, J_____ _. _____ effective 1 August 2013.  DFAS also indicated that since the applicant divorced prior to retirement, their system was updated to reflect child only coverage at retirement and a credit was issued for 2 months of SBP payments.  

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The member may elect not to participate (with their spouse’s concurrence, if required), but the election must be made before the first day for which the member is eligible to receive retired pay.  

9.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the 
second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends she did not have a good understanding of the SBP program when she first signed up.  However, there is no evidence of record which indicates that an error or injustice has occurred in this case.  

2.  The evidence of record shows that she enrolled in the SBP for spouse and child coverage.  

3.  The applicant was divorced on 25 June 2013.  
4.  The applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 on 2 July 2013 requesting a change in her participation in the SBP based on her divorce.  She retired on 31 July 2013 for length of service.

5.  The applicant's records at DFAS revealed she had SBP for child coverage effective 1 August 2013.  Since she divorced prior to her retirement on 31 July 2013, DFAS updated her SBP coverage from spouse and child coverage to child only coverage and she was given a credit for 2 months of SBP spouse payments.  

6.  There is insufficient evidence in which to grant the applicant's request; however she will have a one-year period, beginning on 1 August 2015, in which to terminate her SBP enrollment.  She is encouraged to contact the nearest Retirement Services Officer for more information prior to making her decision.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019660



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019660



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010128

    Original file (20130010128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Letter from DFAS, dated 4 April 2013 * DD Form 2656-2, dated 5 March 2013 * Letter from DFAS, dated 10 May 2013 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Form) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is married will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C (spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012764

    Original file (20100012764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter also advised her that she must notify the USAR Personnel Command, using DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), of her decision within 90 days of the date of the letter. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, required Reserve and Guard members, who had completed their service obligation, considered entitled for retired pay, but who are not yet age 60, to obtain their spouse's concurrence in RCSBP elections that do not provide maximum spouse coverage (immediate option). As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001913

    Original file (20150001913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he never received a 20-year letter because he had issues with his retirement points and active time * after his points were corrected, he still did not receive a 20-year letter and was thus not given an opportunity to make an election * once he became retirement eligible, his retirement orders were issued in 2013 and backdated to 2006 * at the time of his retirement, he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * he was not married; he placed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016893

    Original file (20130016893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both believed that they made the correct election on the form not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premiums are being deducted from her Army retired pay. Section IX (SBP Election), item 26 (Beneficiary Category(ies)), the applicant failed to make an election in any of the categories (i.e., a through g), although she did indicate in block g (I Elect Not to Participate in SBP) with an "X" that, "I Do Have Eligible Dependents Under The Plan"; c. Section XI (Certification), item 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017267

    Original file (20130017267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she and her spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Once she made the RCSBP election the premiums would have to be recovered from her retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021899

    Original file (20090021899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021899 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant retired on 1 May 1998. He was not married at the time and he elected SBP coverage for child-only coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02604

    Original file (BC 2013 02604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS/CL states that according to law, they cannot provide former spouse SBP coverage without an election at retirement for former spouse SBP or a deemed election from the former spouse or her attorney in her behalf within one year from the date of the final divorce. The applicant was provided automatic coverage for SBP as DFAS did not receive his election for former spouse and child coverage. He enrolled in “SBP for former spouse” at his Air Force retirement out-processing in 2001,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020627

    Original file (20090020627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 under Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) to indicate she concurred with the SBP decision made by her spouse. The applicant's RAS, dated 2 November 2009, shows that he is paying SBP coverage, spouse only, in the amount of $265.92. An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only coverage, if applicable) coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007159

    Original file (20130007159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section IV (Coverage), she elected Option A - I decline to make an election until age 60; c. Section VIII (Member Signature), the applicant and a witness signed the document on 11 April 2013; d. Section IX (Spouse Concurrence): (1) item 20 (Spouse), "I hereby consent in my spouse's RCSBP election as indicated. However, it appears the applicant's spouse was not notified of the applicant's election to decline SBP because there is no evidence of record that shows a spouse concurrence letter...