Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019559
Original file (20130019559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019559 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  while stationed at Fort Hood, TX he was convicted of false imprisonment and served 11 months in civilian confinement from October 1981 to September 1982.
 
	b.  he has not been in any trouble with the law since then.

	c.  he has two honorable discharges and the highest rank he attained was staff sergeant.	

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 July 1972 for a period of 
3 years.  He was honorably discharged on 21 July 1974 for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 22 July 1974 for a period of 4 years.  On 9 May 1978, he was honorably discharged for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 10 May 1978 for a period of 4 years.  He trained as a tactical communications system operator mechanic and radio teletype operator.  He attained the rank of staff sergeant on 30 May 1978.

3.  Records show:

	a.  in March 1981, he was convicted in civilian court of kidnapping and he received a sentence of up to five years of confinement.

	b.  in August 1981, a bar to reenlistment was imposed against him.

	c.  he was placed in civil confinement on 19 February 1982.

4.  His record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge action.

5.  On 15 September 1982, the separation authority approved the discharge of the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 ((Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for misconduct (conviction by civilian authorities).  He directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

6.  On 24 September 1982, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  He completed a total of 9 years, 7 months, and 11 days of creditable active service with 218 days of lost time. 

7.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.




8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  

	a.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense (military or civilian offense), and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he has not been in any trouble since his discharge.  However, good post-service conduct alone is not a basis for upgrading a discharge.

2.  His remaining contentions were carefully considered.  However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary it must be presumed his separation processing was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  Without the discharge packet to consider, it is presumed his characterization of service was commensurate with his overall record of service.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant an honorable or general discharge.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019559





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019559



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003513

    Original file (20150003513.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives) and reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. However, his contentions are not supported by the evidence of record. The evidence of record shows he accepted NJP for failure to go to his appointed place of duty from 12 November until 16 November 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010290

    Original file (20140010290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows he was over 22 years of age at the time of his court-martial proceedings. There is no evidentiary basis for upgrading his bad conduct discharge to honorable or any other character of service. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010290 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010290 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013680

    Original file (20120013680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 14 June 1978. On 7 May 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge. He provided no evidence or argument to show his discharge should be upgraded and his military record contains no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009127

    Original file (20080009127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant essentially states that there is no error or injustice in his military record, but asks that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) upgrade his discharge, citing his length of service and him receiving an honorable discharge prior to his discharge under other than honorable conditions. In an undated letter, the applicant's commanding officer notified him of his intention to initiate action under the provisions of Chapter 14 (Separation for Misconduct), Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010288

    Original file (20110010288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 August 1982, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was separated for misconduct, conviction by civil court. __________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005733

    Original file (20080005733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093308C070212

    Original file (03093308C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 19 December 1980 the applicant reenlisted in the Army for 4 years. Special Court-Martial Order Number 138, published by Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Benning on 9 September 1982, shows that the applicant was arraigned and charged with eight specifications of misconduct, e.g., AWOL,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011492

    Original file (20090011492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 April 1982, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for misconduct. On 14 April 1982, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct and directed he be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021297

    Original file (20140021297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his case was an isolated incident and that there were no alcohol/drug treatment services available at the time of his service. Special Court-Martial Order Number 106, dated 3 August 1983, shows the convening authority approved the sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007199

    Original file (20090007199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In accordance with Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. _______ _ _x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.