Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019179
Original file (20130019179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019179 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the narrative reason and reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states that she was not discharged for medical reasons or misconduct and she needs her RE code changed in order to enlist in the U.S. Air Force.

3.  The applicant provides her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) and DD Form 214 (copies 1 and 4).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  She enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 November 2009.  After completion of training, she served in military occupational specialty 15P (Aviation Operations Specialist).

2.  Her record is void of a complete separation packet; however, it contains a memorandum issued by the 21st Cavalry Brigade (Air Combat), III Corps and Fort Hood, Fort Hood, TX, dated 20 June 2012.  This memorandum, SUBJECT: Separation Under Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), Chapter 8 (Pregnancy), approved her separation and directed she be separated from the Army prior to her expiration term of service (ETS) due to pregnancy with an honorable discharge certificate.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 8 establishes policy and procedures and provides authority for voluntary separation of enlisted women because of pregnancy.  The unit commander will direct an enlisted woman who believes that she is pregnant, or whose physical condition indicates that she might be pregnant, to report for diagnosis by a physician at the servicing military medical treatment facility.  When service medical authorities determine an enlisted woman is pregnant, she will be counseled and assisted as required by chapter 8.  The unit commander will explain that the purpose of the counseling is to provide information concerning options, entitlements, and responsibilities and that the Soldier may remain on active duty or upon request, be separated per this chapter.  

4.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes disqualification.  RE-3 applies to persons who have a waivable disqualification.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states that the SPD code MDF is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or child birth.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-3 code will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of MDF.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Her record is void of her complete separation packet; however, she was separated for pregnancy, a voluntary process.  It must be presumed that she was properly counseled and informed of her options to remain on active duty or to be voluntarily separated by reason of pregnancy, and further, that she acknowledged that she was counseled concerning her options and there was no coercion to influence her decision.  Therefore, the reason for her separation is correct and the SPD and RE codes assigned are commensurate with the authority and reason for her discharge.

2.  According to the SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table the appropriate 
RE code for the SPD code of MDF is 3.  Therefore, her assigned RE code of 3 is correct.
3.  Her RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of her separation.  There is no basis for changing a properly assigned RE code.

4.  The applicant is advised that if she desires to reenter military service, she should continue to work with her local recruiter as they can best advise her as to the needs of the service and are responsible for processing enlistment waivers for the applicant's RE code provided she is otherwise eligible. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019179





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019179



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009950

    Original file (20120009950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Service) from a 3 to a 1. She voluntarily requested separation from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019960

    Original file (20100019960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Service) from a "3" to a "1." She voluntarily requested separation from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and are required to process requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011372

    Original file (20130011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code MDF is the correct code for Soldiers voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and SPD code MDB is the correct code for Soldier's voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows the applicant became pregnant and underwent pregnancy counseling as required by the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141

    Original file (20090009141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014308

    Original file (20140014308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 July 1990, to change her separation code from "MDF" to "CIWD" (Condition Interfered with Duties). It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's request for correction of her DD Form 214, for the period ending 2 July 1990, to change her separation code from "MDF" to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016987

    Original file (20100016987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 May 1983, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy and directed her service be characterized as honorable. Her DD Form 214 confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a narrative reason of separation as "pregnancy" and a separation code of "MDF." Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant voluntarily requested separation for hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015119

    Original file (20090015119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 January 2009, she requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 8-1, by reason of pregnancy with a desired separation date of 1 April 2009. She may request a specific separation date; however, the separation authority and her military physician will determine the separation date. With respect to medical disability, the evidence of record shows she suffered some illnesses during her military service and was seen by medical personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008005

    Original file (20140008005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * her reason for separation is incorrect * her DD Form 214 shows the separation authority as chapter 8 and the narrative reason as pregnancy * it was a hardship discharge * she had an emergency delivery of her son on 7 October 1995 * her son died on 23 October 1995 after disconnecting life support * she could not return to active duty and was discharged for hardship * she was not pregnant on 15 December 1995 * she realizes it has been 19 years, but this is the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009581

    Original file (20080009581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's contention that the code of RE-4 she was assigned upon her discharge should be changed to a code of RE-1 was carefully considered, and although the applicant was properly assigned a code of RE-4 based on the authority and reason for her discharge based on the policies in effect at the time, partial equity relief is warranted under current standards. As a result, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity to correct the applicant's record to show she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020248

    Original file (20130020248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show something other than pregnancy. Her commander stated she had the option to elect to remain on active duty or she could elect to be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy. The evidence of record confirms the applicant...