Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019042
Original file (20130019042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019042 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her Letter of Commendation be added to her DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and she requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  She states:

* her Letter of Commendation was not put in her 201 File
* she was told that she would get her medal in Oakland, then Oakland [personnel] said she should have been given it at headquarters
* since she had to give up her sergeant stripe she thought she would lose her medal

3.  She provides a Letter of Commendation and her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 August 1959.

3.  Her DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in:

	a.  Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) she was promoted to the temporary rank and pay grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 11 October 1961.

	b.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) she received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout her tenure on active duty.

	c.  Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) she was credited with service in Okinawa from 8 June 1961 to 6 July 1962.

	d.  Section 6 (Time Lost under Section 6(a) Appendix 2b Manual for Court Martial (MCM) 51 and Subsequent to Normal Date ETS) no entry indicating she had lost time.

	e.  Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) she received a Letter of Appreciation, dated 29 March 1961.

4.  She provided a copy of a Letter of Commendation, dated 5 July 1962, which she received for her outstanding performance of duty during the past year in the Finance and Accounting Office.

5.  She was discharged on 11 July 1962 in the rank/pay grade of SP4/E-4.  She completed 2 years, 11 months, and 8 days of total active service with no lost time.  Her service records do not contain a commander's disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Her DD Form 214 shows she received a Letter of Appreciation.  

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant received a Letter of Commendation on 5 July 1962; therefore, it should be added to her DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's service records are void of orders that show she was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 August 1959 through 11 July 1962.  There is no evidence available that indicates she received any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded her from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, she should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 4 August 1959 through 11 July 1962 and her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 4 August 1959 through 11 July 1962; and

	b.  adding the Letter of Commendation and the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) to her DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019042





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019042



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011784

    Original file (20110011784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout both periods of his active service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021283

    Original file (20100021283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings through his service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the 1st award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active service from 31 March 1959 through 30 March 1962 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001632

    Original file (20110001632.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020822

    Original file (20090020822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record), section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) for the period 10 September 1958 to 26 August 1961 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout this period of service. There is no available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show that he completed Ranger training. However, evidence of record shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for his qualifying period of service from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007660

    Original file (20100007660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains (and he also provides) a DA Form 24 covering the period 30 June 1959 to 29 June 1962 which contain the following pertinent information: * Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) shows he was assigned to the 37th U.S. Army Artillery Detachment on 20 November 1959 through 23 August 1961 * Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) shows he departed the United States en route to Greece 13 September 1960 and he returned to the United States on 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001135

    Original file (20110001135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her deceased spouse's, a former service member (FSM), DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * All other awards and decorations he may be entitled to 2. Therefore, he is entitled to the NDSM and to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010280

    Original file (20120010280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his enlisted service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020838

    Original file (20110020838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Korea. On 13 January 2010, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) that added award of the National Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027841

    Original file (20100027841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), correspondence to and from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), four commendatory letters, a Marksmanship Award Ceremony handout, and a certificate of training. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001418

    Original file (20110001418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant served a qualifying period of active enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from 9 July 1959 to 8 June 1961. a. c. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence,...