Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018406
Original file (20130018406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    24 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018406 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states:

* he was awarded the medal after his discharge and it was never added to his DD Form 214
* the award was sent to his father's house after his discharge and since he was not living at home his father put it away and forgot to tell him about it
* his father recently passed away and he discovered it when he was sorting through his things

3.  The applicant provides:

* an award certificate for the ARCOM
* letter of commendation

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 1976 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (military police (MP)).

3.  Item 5 (Oversea Service) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Korea from 20 June 1978 through 16 August 1979.

4.  On 6 September 1979, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Grenade, Pistol, and Machine Gun Bars.

6.  Permanent Orders 161-6, issued by Headquarters, 2nd Infantry Division dated 15 October 1979 awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 24 June 1978 to 22 August 1979 while assigned to the 2nd MP Company.

7.  There is no evidence to show the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

8.  There is no evidence of any disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the AGCM (1st Award).

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:

	a.   the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  



   b.  states the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea.  The period of eligibility is 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Permanent orders show the applicant was awarded the ARCOM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four with 3 years of creditable active service.  Since there is no record of any disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification and no time lost, it appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the AGCM for the period 7 September 1976 through 6 September 1979 based on completion of three years of service.  Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  He served a period of qualifying service for award of the KDSM.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period 7 September 1976 through 6 September 1979; and


	b.  adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* ARCOM
* AGCM (1st Award)
* KDSM



      _____________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018406





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018406



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022442

    Original file (20120022442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (2nd Award), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and U.S. Army Recruiter Badge. The applicant contends that his two DD Forms 214 should be corrected to show award of the KDSM, OSR, U.S. Army Recruiter Badge, and AGCM (2nd Award). Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020305

    Original file (20100020305.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM). To date, he has not received the orders or the medals. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015735

    Original file (20130015735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004729

    Original file (20120004729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). General Orders Number 232, Fort Lewis, Washington, dated 2 November 1971, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 January 1970 to 19 November 1971. It is authorized for award to members of the armed forces of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003840C070208

    Original file (20040003840C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Service Record (DA Form 24) for his first period of active duty service from 29 July 1961 through 28 July 1964. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed two qualifying periods of honorable active duty service for the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 28 June 1969 DD Form 214 by deleting the current list of awards contained in Item 13 and replacing it with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010771

    Original file (20100010771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there are a number of awards he received while serving on active duty that are not listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s record shows he served in Southwest Asia (SWA) in support of Operation Vigilant Warrior from 28 October through 22 November 1994. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011463

    Original file (20090011463.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011463 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, he should be awarded the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 19 June 1967 through 2 March 1970, and it should be added to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014983

    Original file (20080014983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM on 1 April 1977, less than 30 days prior to his separation. Although orders authorizing the ARCOM are normally required to support adding an award to a member's record and/or DD Form 214, in this case the ARCOM certificate appears to be genuine and signed by the proper award approval authority. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his service in Korea, he is also eligible for the KDSM which should also be added to his record and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005070

    Original file (20130005070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: * he received credit for service in the ROK during the period 17 July 1953 to 8 July 1954 * during his tour of duty in the ROK he was assigned to Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment, during the period 24 July 1953 to 8 July 1954 * no conduct and efficiency ratings for his service 4. Therefore, he was entitled to correction of his record to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...