Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018261
Original file (20130018261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	12 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018261


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he was not awarded the AGCM when he was separated from active duty on 18 May 1961.  He believes he was overlooked for this award.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 18 June 1958, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial entry training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 951.10 (Military Police).
3.  On 18 May 1961, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 1 day of net service during this period of enlistment.  The highest rank/pay grade he attained during his period of service was specialist four/E-4.

4.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received a "good" conduct and efficiency rating during the period 9 September 1960 through 18 May 1961.

5.  His record is void of documentation showing the applicant was awarded the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the AGCM was carefully considered; however, it was not supported by the evidence in this case.

2.  The evidence of record shows he did not receive all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his period of active military service as required by the governing Army regulation.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____   DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018975



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018261



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014310

    Original file (20140014310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Army Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014626

    Original file (20130014626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received a "Good" conduct and efficiency rating for the period 31 March to 26 May 1961 while in advanced individual training (AIT). His military record shows he had a "Good" conduct rating during the period 31 March 1961 to 26 May 1961 while in AIT, which a disqualifying factor for award of the AGCM for his entire period of service. Since he had no record of any disciplinary action or a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017571

    Original file (20130017571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant in this case did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014943

    Original file (20140014943 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and any other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant had "excellent" character and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM (1st award). As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019842

    Original file (20110019842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a photograph of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) in support of his application. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 25 November 1960 through 13 November 1962 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018918

    Original file (20090018918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 January 1951. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 22 years, 4 months, and 12 day of continuous active military service, and was retired on 31 May 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002896

    Original file (20110002896.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his already awarded Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army of Occupation Medal (AOM), and Expert and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Badges be entered on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record), Section 4 – Chronological Record of Military Service, shows the applicant's conduct and efficiency was rated as excellent or unknown except for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014448

    Original file (20130014448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018983

    Original file (20080018983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The governing regulation, in effect at the time, required that a member meet all specified regulatory criteria in order to be awarded the AGCM, which included that he receive all "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during all assignment periods.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017381

    Original file (20080017381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 February 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017381 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and that the rank listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the rank title specialist four (SP4). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct...