Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018185
Original file (20130018185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  


		BOARD DATE:	  5 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018185 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM) requests correction of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:

* he served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) vice the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG)
* his social security number (SSN) as XX5-XX-XXXX vice XX6-XX-XXXX

2.  The applicant states her deceased spouse did not serve in the ILARNG; he served in the USAR.  The SSN on his DD Form 214 is incorrect and she is providing documents with his correct SSN.  She is applying for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) headstone marker and they will not put the correct branch of service on the marker unless his DD Form 214 is corrected. 

3.  The applicant provides the FSM's DD Form 214, Honorably Discharge Certificate, certificate of death, certificate of marriage, and her military identification (ID) card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the applicant provided the FSM's DD Form 214 which is sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The FSM's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty for training (ADT) as a member of the ARNG on 29 May 1970.  He was honorably released from active duty on 27 September 1970 to the control of the ILARNG.  

4.  Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his SSN with the third digit as 6.  Item 30 (Remarks) of this form contains the entry "Released from active duty and returned to State control as member of the Army National Guard of Illinois to complete remaining service obligation."

5.  The FSM authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block of the DD Form 214 on 27 September 1970.

6.  A review of the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) shows on 22 October 1990 the USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, issued the FSM a memorandum of Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter).  This 20-year letter shows the third digit of his SSN as 5.

7.  The applicant provides the FSM's Honorable Discharge Certificate that shows he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 August 1991.  He would have been transferred to the Retired Reserve at that time.  This certificate shows the third digit of his SSN as 5. 

8.  Orders P07-924598, dated 8 July 2010, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, retired him from the USAR and placed him on the Retired List on 1 August 2010.  This order shows the third digit of his SSN as 5.

9.  The applicant provides her family member U.S. Uniformed Services ID card, issued on 22 September 2010, wherein it shows the third digit of the FSM's SSN as 5. 

10.  The FSM died on 1 April 2013.  The applicant provides a certificate of death, issued 2 April 2013, wherein it shows the third digit of the FSM's SSN as 5. 

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  The regulation stated all entries on the DD Form 214 were required to be verified against source documents for completeness and accuracy.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the FSM's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served in the USAR and not the ILARNG and to show his SSN with the third digit as 5 vice 6. 

2.  There are no available records to show what SSN was listed when the FSM entered active duty on 29 May 1970; however, the evidence of record confirms that during his service in the USAR his SSN was listed with the third digit as 5.  It is logical to presume that a typographical error may have occurred during the preparation of his DD Form 214 on 27 September 1970 and his SSN was inadvertently entered with the third digit as 6.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show the third digit of his SSN as 5.

3.  With respect to the correction of his DD Form 214 to show he served in the USAR vice the ILARNG in 1970, there is no evidence that supports this contention.  Although the FSM may have served in the USAR for 20 years and retired from the USAR, there is no evidence that shows when he served on ADT in 1970 that he was a member of the USAR and not the ARNG.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed what the Army did in this case was correct.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to this portion of the requested relief.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry in item 3 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the social security number shown on his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 3 August 1991.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the correction of his DD Form 214 to show his branch of service as the USAR.  



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018185





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018185



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002901

    Original file (20150002901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-XX-2100. Later enlistment records in the ILARNG show his SSN as it appears on his social security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016306

    Original file (20140016306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SSN) as XX3-XX-XXXX vice XX6-XX-XXXX. Page 4 of his DD Form 4, dated 5 March 1980, shows his SSN with the third digit as 6. The evidence of record confirms when the applicant enlisted in the USAR DEP and the RA he listed his SSN with the third digit as 6 and this is the SSN he used throughout his active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017830

    Original file (20140017830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A thorough review of all documents contained in his available military personnel records, many of which bear his signature, show his SSN consistently appears as XXX-XX-XXX7. His DD Form 214 shows his SSN as XXX-XX-XXX7. All of the documents in his records show he used SSN XXX-XX-XXX7 during his active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024877

    Original file (20110024877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show "5" as the fifth digit of his social security number (SSN) instead of "1." Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN with "1" as the fifth digit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current SSN from item 3 of the FSM's DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005073

    Original file (20140005073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 7 January 1967, in conjunction with his enlistment in the Regular Army, the applicant completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) wherein he listed his SSN with the second and third digits as "72." DISCUSSION AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003059

    Original file (20120003059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003059 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, on behalf of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as "187-xx-xxxx" vice "178-xx-xxxx." Although the FSM's SSN appears as both "178-xx-xxxx" and "187-xx-xxxx" in his military personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002558

    Original file (20130002558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) created upon his entry on active duty shows his SSN with the third digit as 5. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130002558 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130002558 3 ARMY BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010915

    Original file (20100010915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In it she provided the following: a. that she was the retirement noncommissioned officer who prepared the FSM's 20-year letter at the time of his retirement; b. that she talked with the FSM over the phone about his DD Form 1883 prior to the 90-day expiration required to make an RCSBP election; c. the FSM made his RCSBP election; however, following his request for a witness signature from his unit, she never received the DD Form 1883 from the unit; and d. it is her belief that the FSM's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018620

    Original file (20090018620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. three of his LES's that show for the period: * 1-31 July 1985, a PEBD of 14 June 1974 * 1-31 December 1988, a PEBD of 11 January 1979 * 1 August 2003, a pay date of 5 October 1977 c. an ILARNG memorandum, dated 9 June 2005, that shows the Retirement Points Accounting Management noncommissioned officer requested that the Pay Branch change the applicant's PEBD to 22 March 1974. DFAS records shows the applicant's current retirement date is 1 October 2007 and that he has 30 years, 1 month,...